MojoJolo

It's not clear to me. So it's $79 per month or per year or forever?

Also, who will add the items to be for sale?

I wonder when will the stock be available again? And will it be a much larger stock? I'm not rushing to buy, but I hope to have some order this week.

If you will ask me, my answer is no. I'm living in a region / country wherein LTE is still "not there yet". I'm buying this phone because it's cheap. I don't mind the lack of LTE because it's still somewhat useless in my country.

So the "no contract" or "no carrier" version is only available in the Google Play?

Are there other ways of buying Nexus 4 rather than online in Google Play Store?

I think you might want to choose Nexus 4 because it's the cheapest. As I read, they have specs as close to each other. But if you think without having an LTE is a deal breaker, Nexus 4 is not a good phone for you.

That's right! I'm buying this phone because of its price. It's cheap compared to other phones with the same specs. The lack of LTE is not really a setback to me (and I think to all others that live in a third world country). LTE is almost "not yet" existing in our region/country.

In positive note, I was thinking this to be integrated in touch screen phones several years from now!

Imagine using your phone, playing with it while walking in the strees and it's charging through the solar film integrated in the screen.

I'm excited to know those companies. I hope you update those list in the future!

Wow. Every 3 months! I was thinking what 2011 and 2012 companies might be included in that list in the future?

Also, I noticed that most if not all of these companies are Silicon Valley startups. Maybe the frequency of billion dollar companies will increase if the list includes companies world wide.

May I know where and how the data collected? And what is the first word in the array?

The JSON output contains all the sentences arranged based on their importance. It also contains the total score of individual sentences plus their scores for each features (criteria).

The features used are title, sentence length, and sentence position. More feature / criteria will be implemented soon.

This is an awesome work! Maybe a good substitute / improvement for the overused image carousels.

Here a clickable link http://textteaser.com/

The problem in summarizing news manually is that it takes too much effort for a human to do it. The efficiency may be good, but as many news pass by, his efficiency will go down. (assuming that he's only the one summarizing)

I experienced an article in TheVerge which is mainly a video as its content.

What I will be amazed is a good automatic summarization algorithm that is using abstraction and not just extraction.

Also, check out circa (http://cir.ca/). Never tried, but as I read, it uses both human and algorithm to "summarize" articles.

We use lexical chains in our undergraduate thesis. Not a fan of it. AFAIK, not much of the text we summarized are affected by our lexical chain feature. It is a minor feature in our thesis. We combined lexical chains with other summarization techniques.

It's a good concept, but chains maybe a long one and may not be serve its "summary" purpose (maybe that's only for our case). In our thesis, we just extract the 5 most important sentences. Sentences with a lexical chain to a sentence or sentences may consume all the 5 sentences we needed and not leaving a room for other sentences in the text.

A friend of mine is doing a research about this. Clustering articles through the use of neural networks. But of course, it can only cluster articles that is in their collection or corpus.

I found the answer to my question. It is still extraction. Doing abstraction is still a difficult problem to solve.

the app's summaries are intelligible sentences, but since they're extracted from articles without providing any other context besides headlines, they often sound disjointed and non-conclusive. http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/1/3583720/summly-nick-d-aloi...

Is he doing extraction or abstraction? I'm doing a research about automatic summarization and also creating an app for it. Summly and my idea has a different approach but I'm curious in some aspects of how summly summarizes articles.

I think last year, Summly was pulled out in the app store. Back in those days, the quality of there summary is not that impressive. I'm still downloading the app and will check its performance.

For what kind of apps I mean?

Tried Summly, as a matter of fact, it is included in my related systems. I don't know what happen to them that they don't exist as of today. Well, in my opinion, it doesn't summarize that good.

You also might want to check Cruxbot (http://www.cruxbot.com/).

Can extracted sentences be considered as outline?

This is a cool idea. But the algorithm only extracts the most important sentences. What will happen is it will just tweet the most important sentence in the blog post (considering that it's 140 characters or less).

Mine is only single document summarization. Yes, it's an interesting technology but I think there is not much of improvement.

Output is 5 sentences. Quality is still being tested but here's a sample:

from this article http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/09/do-you-need-to-be-a-jerk-to... Do You Need To Be A Jerk To Be A Successful Entrepreneur?

- I recently read Ben Austen’s WIRED article about Steve Jobs, which prompted me to put together my thoughts about the tradeoffs of being a successful entrepreneur.

- After reading it, you might be convinced that you can either be a jerk and successful or decent and mediocre.

- Successful people come in all forms and they all have different limitations, baggage, prejudices, and ways of looking at the world.

- Jobs was successful because his unreasonably high goals, brilliant insight, and relentless passion made people want to work with him.

- You don’t have to have a surly personality to be successful, although sometimes it comes with the territory.

Who can be the target market for those APIs that I will sell?

I find the riddle and the answers amazing! But the answers I saw were only for even number of children. Is there a good solution for odd numbers?

Does this work for odd number of children?

I don't know why Facebook reacted like that. But as I understand, those information are not from Facebook itself. They are from an unknown third party app. Also, anyone who has a knowledge in Facebook API can mine those information by creating a Facebook app. I'm sure those app like "God wants you to know" have more than 1 million Facebook information.

By reacting like that, I think Facebook can be considered as guilty as charged.