Followup to "I bought more than 1 million Facebook data entries for $5"
talkweb.eu
talkweb.eu
I wish I had something more substantive to say here, but the problem is that we give Facebook an extraordinarily huge power in our personal lives. It's not just some random web service.
I 'deleted my life', and y'know what? Nothing changed. I still have the same friends I talked to before Facebook, still meet up for drinks on their birthdays, still arrange nights out, and still share what's going on in my life.
The best thing about no Facebook? I know what information is out there, and nothing personal that Advertising Inc. can buy.
I'm 47. Because of the network effect, using Facebook I've connected with people I knew and cared about that I haven't seen in 30 years. Dozens of them. I barely remembered person A and B, found them and became friends. Then they knew person C and D. E and F were close behind. Pretty soon I have 200 friends from places scattered all over the world.
Life sneaks up on you, and people stop having the same phone, email, or street address. You wake up one day wondering what happened to Bob, then slowly realize that you'll never see him again. It's a weird feeling.
Yes, if I were 20 and still had a cell phone with all my friends from 4 years ago, it'd be no big deal. But if I lost my FB data now? I'd never find these guys again.
Personal sidebar ahead: by the way, my wife and I are having a competition to see who can get the most friends. As long as you're not selling anything, and I promise not to sell you anything, send me an invite! Right now she has 600 friends and I have something like 250.
God didn't come down and carve the Approved And Valid Contexts of Facebook Friending on a piece of rock.
You haven't bothered to copy off important contact data to some personal file? That's crazy.
You wake up one day wondering what happened to Bob, then slowly realize that you'll never see him again. It's a weird feeling.
True. OTOH, when that has happened to me, I realize there's a reason for it.
At 54 I find that a) life is not only short, it's shorter than you think, and b) there's a whole lot going on right now that dwelling on acquaintances lost to the past is probably a waste of time.
[B]y the way, my wife and I are having a competition to see who can get the most friends.
Seems we're very different people, so my anecdotal reflection likely as alien to you as yours is to me.
If you'd like to make it about me, happy to do that. My email is in my profile.
That wasn't my intention, but your post was about you and how you use FB. Just as my response was about me and how I (don't) use FB.
I'm curious to know, though, how anyone can know if they are an average FB user. I know a few people who use FB and they all seem to use it differently. I wonder if each of them think they're an average FB user too.
I think that's the key here. Smart phones which you use like a database.
If you had that when you were 20, you might have hundreds of contacts in your smart phone today. People rarely change both emails and phone numbers at the same time.
Unless you're older, you have no idea how true this is. So many people I knew in college and this happened so frequently once I got out college. I suddenly realized people at that age are so nomadic. They move frequently, change addresses and numbers and unless you're best friends with them, you'll never know what happened to them.
Scary and yes, very weird to have known someone one day and then a few days later, they're a ghost to you.
I never get to see any of the photos he shares.
Let's look at an alternative scenario: What if your friend posted the photos online to Flickr, Shutterfly, Picasa etc. and sent you a link via email? Would you still complain?
My point is not to evangelize Google+ here, I am using it only because you referred to it. My point is that the power that FB has over your online social life is entirely up to you, and you can choose to increase/decrease it at will.
s/television/facebook/
But this isn't for the social aspect, I don't post status updates or photos or share personal information (not even my Birthday), however Facebook Groups are just so widely used that it's hard to stay in the loop for certain things without them.
The problem is for those people who decide to give FB huge powering their personal lives. I'm not among those, so there's no "we" for me here.
_My_ problem is to try not sounding like a cranky old man when I often encourage people to move away from Facebook.
A friend mentioned this as an option back at the beginning of the "you can't delete - only disable your account" change a few years ago when Facebook made you go through a click maze and a waiting period before terminating your account.
Idiotic, but illustrative of how frustrating Facebook's polices can be.
One of them is that all data I create, which is stored, I should have access to, programmatically preferably. If I sign up for a site like Facebook, and create data such as friend connections I should have direct access to that data. Without access, there's an anti-competitive atmosphere. It is near impossible for me to create a new social network today on a similar scale to Facebook, because people's data is locked up. Even Google+ with google's resources, and popularity couldn't get people to detach from Facebook. I watched as people enthusiastically went to Google+, but then left as they found everything they wanted to do with it was locked up elsewhere. It is true that Facebook has this data available on their API, however it also has the ability to choose who can use it. That's the problem. I feel this data should be available for the express purpose of allowing competition to flourish.
of course there's other examples. Linked in has almost exclusive access to my resume + business contacts. Gmail has my life's history. Literally. I probably talk to my girlfriend on gchat more than when we're home. By the time we get home, there's nothing new :D Almost every big decision we've made has been while chatting at work. I can go back, and look at the record of our conversation I had when we came up with the name for my dog. Or when we decided to move to a different state, or when I told her my mom was hit by a car. No one company should be able to wipe out my life's memories. No one company should have exclusive access to this data. It is MY DATA (i realize the law doesn't recognize this as true yet, but it will).
Every day as we move to digital lives, the services we use go from being fun things we do, to critical infrastructure. Those gchat logs are really important to me. Those facebook status conversations are important to me. I didn't choose facebook based on their features. It kind of just happened. But now its a part of my life (a lot of our lives). I want control over it.
Facebook wraps up every status update, picture, etc in a .zip file that you can download.
I'm in the UK, and Europe has a nice set of data protection laws. Enforcing those laws is sub-optimal.
As far as I understand, the first few people to try it got more complete responses, but the data was still incomplete.
So, while technically it is your right, good luck getting anything more than you can already download.
My main point is that the barrier to entry for making a new social network/reader etc is not one of innovation. Search for instance is hard to compete with because the bar has been set so high. Facebook is impossible to compete with because of its walls. I don't feel this page brings those walls down.
How do you decide who has to comply with it? Every time I build a website that collects any data from users at all, do I have to also create an API for accessing that data?
Bigger companies such as FB and Google would most likely just move stuff offshore to get around this anyway.
They can be found here: https://www.google.com/settings/exportdata
To paraphrase Joel Spolsky from his Startup School session, "grandma's gonna be calling".
It does not guarantee any kind of automated access (and in fact, only at least once per year do you have free access), but in theory lets you retrieve all data associated to your person from any company (and allows you to correct wrong information, respectively require deletion of data that is no longer needed).
If you try to apply it to Facebook, they'll however just redirect you to their data download tool (which only gives you access to a a limited subset of the data). It lacks some enforcement, unfortunately.
I've personally never felt comfortable with having my social life online and that's why I've opted out of using Facebook, Google+ or any other social networking services for that matter. My social life doesn't suffer because of that at all, in fact, my bond with the people who are close to me has become even stronger due to a lack of social noise in my life. I see my best buddies a few times a week anyway and when I really need to talk to someone else, I can just email them or give them a call. The whole Facebook/Google+/[throw in random SNS here] thing is a joke.
Europe's Data Directive applies to all users outside of the US and Canada. The data directive gives me the right to ask them all data they have on me, and the right to have them remove it.
As a European they have given me that right by setting up a company in Ireland.
Sincerely, A non-anti, non-pro barely-occasional, FB user :)
Honestly, if you give one company that much power, then you're the foolish one. Same thing with a Kindle account, iCloud, SkyDrive, Twitter.. If you have valuable information in the cloud, back it up!
I personally tried to "delete my life" a while back and the only reason I still have an (unused) Facebook profile is because it got reactivated at some point.
If one day FB disappear we can move to another social network. It is very likely that we have our closest friends' emails so we don't loose any actual connections. As far as not-that-close friends are concerned, many of us will be delighted that we don't have to keep them at social network any longer (I am speaking here about people who managed to gather together 500 friend and they don't really know 70% of them, but are just to polite to delete them).
I guess if Dropbox would disappear or Google/Gmail would disappear or Flicker that would be really harmful for many people, but Facebook... Marketing people would be upset for some time, but average FB user will move to G+ or Diaspora or something similar in no time.
In fact, we can see how good e-mail is, despite spam and phishing problems. The point is that nobody owns e-mail, it is open standard. In the IM space we have Jabber, which moves e-mail openess to IM world.
In social area we need similar thing, the closest one is Diaspora, but we need something better. If it will be available then any larger portal would have it's own version, similarly as most portals offer e-mail accounts.
REALLY
This needs to be a service...
The problem is that its just like credit reporting: the data can be obfuscated from you - but not from everyone else who wants the data that is a part of "the system".
Facebook is perm - thus I have never had an account and never will.
Users can benefit from having a photo repos and a wall etc... but users suffer from corp and gov data mining of said data. fark that
It's not the end of the world if they ban you.
Aside from people using it to sell things/their business, most people will not lose much of anything. In fact, they will probably gain, since they won't be spending XXX minutes on FB each month.
Warning: According to Facebook you are not allowed to read this post, so beware.
WTF
I'm happy to report not a single thing changed in my life. No fewer parties, snowboarding events, burning man engagements, or family connections. Everyone who was my friend (Defined as "People who will come and help me move or visit me in hospital") remained my friend and keep in pretty much the same amount of contact.
Isn't that the risk of putting your personal data up on Facebook? If you fear them so much, why would you trust them with your online identity?
I was impressed with the account recovery process ("you entered an old password -- do you want to recover your account?"), but I felt like they were completely optimized for recovery versus preventing the intrusion in the first place (ala Google's two-factor auth).
Anyway, in this case they obviously took the wrong approach with the blogger and I hope it blows up in their faces. (Microsoft and everyone else used to not be nice to security researchers, Facebook will no doubt learn that cooperation is a better strategy too).
But I guess it's tricky -- maybe I'm signing in from a remote location after many months of inactivity to post some vacation photos, and can't receive texts on my phone because it doesn't work in whatever country I'm in...
It's the little things like this that put me off to Facebook. It feels like every attempt to make the site "better" is just another attempt to get more information from a user.
It would be preferable if they could just use the Google Authenticator app like a few other sites do.
I had my account compromised once, it's not something I want to repeat.
"By who?"
"Top. Men."
By reacting like that, I think Facebook can be considered as guilty as charged.
Please let us know if you were working using some other better approach.
On the other hand, they are trying to solve this issue secretly, no disclosure. And we dont yet know if they are taking any privacy measures to prevent this kind of data leak.
By using an app you are giving them access to a whole bunch of your personal information. I always assumed that many were scraping data from my profile. This is why I have never use Facebook for authentication.
When I read the original post I figured Facebook would want the data so they could narrow down who the probable culprit is. I would have thought finding a common app among a million users probably wouldn't be too difficult.
That said the nature of this conversation is ridiculous.