302 karma · joined January 29, 2010
. is taken. : is taken. propose a better alternate and maybe it'll end up in the language.
This has pretty excellent documentation. Like really excellent documentation. But jumping into the code itself is a little bit of a beast with no tests or comments.
so: is testing on your roadmap?
as a seller, I can see the use case. Maybe integration with online arcades? kongregate, for example.
(fyi, one half of the team who built the game does not possess a dick)
Specifically:
sharing, comments, bookmarklet for non-rss content.
Float (float.com) has an interesting idea of removing everything except content from facebook/twitter/etc, which I like, but they are still missing a usable webapp and the aforementioned features.
Mind you, I agree that the TSA introduces unprecedented invasions of personal privacy. And I agree that it should be shut down on those grounds. But making the point that TSA kills because it incentivizes driving is silly.
What else is stupid? Privatized Airports. Besides security and fleet maintenance concerns, this sounds like a recipe for monopolistic airport practices, ie, come to Hartsfield Jackson, an airport paid for with tax-payer dollars. I'm not saying that public airports are run like well oiled machines, but I'd rather roll back one stupid administration than throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Also: A lot of what makes it hard to be a founder is not the shame of failure, but knowledge of lost time. If my company goes under, I'm not as disappointed in my lack of success as I'm disappointed in time not spent more productively elsewhere. There's a subtle distinction there.
http://michaelglass.github.com/conway-dark-roast/
and here's my coworkers much more fleshed out version:
why? nice excuse to learn canvas, coffeescript, tdd in javascript. certainly can do it with divs (in fact mpg did it that way first).
I find it much cleaner / easier to write and I don't really see a downside to using it instead.
In the end, execution is key. I value polish over cleverness. Someone who can execute quickly and cleanly is who I want. Testing for those qualities is more difficult and interactive than simple interview questions.
I want to give some financial information to company X. Right now: The way that I do this is by giving that company ALL OF MY SECRET FINANCIAL INFORMATION. Being able to granularly release only a relevant fraction of my information to a third party is much better.
Sure: Giving secret information away without users' consent (a la google buzz): Bad idea. In this case: That's not the point.