LifeLiverTransp

The nightmare employee in this situation is the "rockstar".

I look at another part of society, where the hacking and getting hacked has a long tradition- lawyers and the law. And money subverts them all. In the long run. So lets look at yet another part of society- our own bodys. How does the body detect intruders, or even prevent theire entrance?

1) Provide no interface for hacking. Our stomaches and colons are our main energy interface - they regenerate at a increddible rate. Slimy, colon cells, they live fast, they die fast, holding on to them is near impossible.

2) Have a pre-warn system for getting hacked. If your sensory apparatus deteriorates, go in full reverse on all operations.

3) A general good feature to have - the ability to undo damage, by doing a full reset to a previously working state. Good in software development, good for a society, its a nice last line of defense, that the comon citizen can veto-vote direct democratic.

4) Divide and Conquer: Prevent accumulations of power, by allowing monopolies to be legally usurped. Can proof your employer is in a cartel/monopoly? Congratualations, you are allowed to march out with x% of the company into a seperate company.

5)Dont be a static target. A passive defense is weakness, as it gives the attacker infinite attempts. If attacked, and the attack is proofable, dissolve the attacker, integrate his strengths into the defenses.

Redeclaring what for aeons was wanted and usefull behaviour as sickness? Yes, your ancestors wanted that hobo under the bridge.

He made a excellent scout, he was fearless and his pattern search skills where superior to yours. He kept you fed, he kept you save, until he was no longer useful. If it has no skin colour, and the difference is all in the head- one could obviously not term this a race. It has to be visual, to be a acceptable concept.

Look at him, going the way, you will go, once your usefullness has ended.

The individual, is basically legacy hardware, and we refined hacking this legacy hardware over the past 20 years. The combined interest in hacking this hardware will always be more effective and cheaper then all defense, bugfixes and updates the individual and his peers can muster.

We should criminalize the act of hacking individuals, as the hardware can not be changed and applying security updates and bugfixes has proven ineffective or impossible. It should be viewed not as a weakness of the person but a vile act on a vurnerable creature. Similar in nature to the human rights, in which we grant us one another - animals as we are - inmuteable dignity. This dignity is violated, if one is hacked/manipulated against his/her own interest to serve the interests of another individual, cooperation, nation-state or a idea.

This sort of behaviour is not new. There have been precedences, where gurus, churches and whole nations, have overriden the individuals possibility to think or act different.

Also hobby projects with abandunt money tend to push for the "Wow"-solution. Not the cheapest possible solution.

Although that would have been solidboosters + spaceguns- and automated in orbit-assembly.

Usually we breed organisms for weekness. Many of our farm animals and plants wouldnt survive without our protection.

Also mutations, often have to overcome obsticles to conquer a new niche. They have to reach a specific habitat or deploy seeds at a distribution system (cars driving dirt roads e.g.).

Lets take a nice little SciFi Example- NASA breeds in its lab a terraformer for venus, a sort of airborn spirondella. This could potentially wipeout all live below, by covering a planet with green "living" clouds.

Now this organism could escape the lab, bot as long as it does not reach a warm, wet climate it is dormant. So even if this dangerous organism was out there- it could potentially deteriorate before it reaches the equatorial belt and starts to bloom.

Nothing is certain in nature, but one thing- if its a success - it trys to be a exponential success.

Like the number of nuclear meltdowns in a thousand years?

Cant remove the chains in your head, if the chains in your head prohibit you from removing those chains.

I sometimes wonder if you could strategically gamble this mechanism as a state actor. You drive the prize up, other companys invest heavily to enter the market, you drive the prize down, buy the bankrupt remains, rince and repeat until you bought all the montan-companies.

TL,DR: Once you are understood aka solved aka hacked, you are always hacked. A player in virtual machine, looking for ways out, constantly in the defense.

Thus psychology is a classified information, because it allows for humans to hack other humans.

The reason fake news can still propagate, is because we have no "Vouching" system, by which a citizen can vouch for a piece of information -or even another citizen/organisation.

Where there inheritance of trust, and one weak link in this chain, the social media plattforms would be very quiet.

Advertising - beyond local, would not be seen. Seeing all content equally, would be a active choice against this model.

The truth is, we could return to this medieval world, where the wise men vouch for information given, or proofs of work vouch for the information, or publishers pay you a cent for reading.

But the powers that be would be undone by this. Thus it will not happen, unless integrated sneakily into a add blocker.

They are using a core mechanism of humanity though. There where always risk-affine outliers, who developed new techniques, tasted forbidden berries, and thus we copy those who stumbled upon success. It was a good strategy until it was hacked.

What happens in the lab, stays in the lab

Scam technology improvements can be beneficial in the long run? Same rule applies after all too military technology research?

Someone ripped off a whole industry who considers humans to be easy manipulated sheeps and animals. Crocodile tears everywhere.

Libertarian core value meltdown detected. Reality intrusion isolated, injecting idealism to stabilize ideology in 3-2-1

Its a friend of you, who is in hospital too. And they need money and even more consent for emergency operations.

? All the specified above endavours - usually run into what one could call the end of the map. Here be science! If you run into e.g. new material science because your goal stretched beyond the scope of what has been done previously, you can blame the engineer for not telling you that you will leave the boundary of the knowledge of a field- you can not blame him for the estimates beeing wrong.

To be perfectly honest- i do not look at the person any more. I only look at promises and outcomes. Power and Money corrupt absolutly, so i dont even want to waste time on the displays of those with rigid morals. They usually do not accomplish anything, cause any move could bring down the little statue of themselves they put up as example.

I rather have a rupt to the core bastard, which still prevents a catastrophic climate change, because he game of thrones whole industries.

Rightfully soo.. the forrest cut for the butts stinks to heaven.

Germany should have bidets like any other civilized country.

I dare to mention, that a lot of bidet development has to do, with the lack of piping that could handle large congesting cellular clumps of matter.

So - the more recent the canalisation - and the bigger the pipesizes used, the less need for biddets.

The weapons thread is bogus anyway. Elon could have a impactor in every spaceship he launches- and level the city, holding the world ransom. With exponential tech every alien noose hair trimmer allows every individual to departicipate a city. This is uncomfortable territory for the high and mighty. Cause if everyone is el presidente with a football- nobody is special. Either we all live in peace, or nobody does in pieces.

Thats the old europe we all know and hate. Dont even search for a solution to a problem, just ban it, until the fad goes away. There are laser projectors, to mark your trajectory ahead of time.. a thousand ways- and instead - the nays.

Like a grumpy old guy, on a bench, envying the still living for his life wasted, hating on the new joys and the joy of the new.

Surely, having such a excellent track record- criminalistic techniques and sciences, will soon reach the level of a true science such psychology.

Its mostly people who have self-worth problems, and as in combat the ultimate wager is ones own life, they love to see a situation where everything is crystall-clear for once- where there actions have meaning and the outcome is a purposefull life, even when it ends. Of course this is naive- and deep down they know. So they strife to replicate "realism" like moths longing for the real fire to fly towards.

Oh, meaningless new world, which holds such braves.

Little bobby tables we used to call him. I hope you learned from this to sanitize your database and your AI Input.

This is how a poor person imagines riches happen to befall any of us. They just happen, one lucky day, you dig and you find a pot of gold, or a ton of pot.

Its a reaction based worldview, where you do not control your own destiny, and wealth is something drained from you, that comes in large quantities by chance.

You do not manage what you got, slouch through a horrible existence to slowly improve yourself. Because that is what the others do, the chancers feed upon. The people who lead that life, are the customers of the drug dealers, those who have the chance to get ahead at the cost of others.

Riches are taken in large quantities by others, with stick up like scenarios- your landlord squeezes you for everything you got, the repair shop rips your wallet open, any accident makes you a indentured slave to the insurance company.

So in a hopeless life, daring to hope, when you get a risky chance, seems actually reasonable.

I would love to have the travel data of boeing management- i would like to see wether they still wanted to fly with there own planes.

Replacement religions?

Sorry, but where is the difference from a secure-system that allows central control - and a male-ware backdoored system?

All that is diffrent is the promise of non-maliciousness. Which often does not hold up. Cause money is corrosive to those little centralized empires of "all-can-fail-but-me".

Security is diversity, as in having a non-centrally controllable ecosystem, that is not a mono-culture. Your updates are the danger, your urge for control is the forrest fire.

Linux is not secure because its updated often. As package maintainer take-overs have show- that is even a vector. Its secure, because its fragmented into a thousand small populations, which offer no real financially interesting attack vector for a large scale take over.

I cant wait for some wicked ideology to stoop to new lows with a patient zero as suicide contact person. Supress the symptoms and keep the agent walking through the bars of a city. Bioweapons a natural, like the europeans had them.