668 karma · joined June 23, 2011
Past: Co-Founder/CTO of DataRank YC 13
www.kennycason.com www.github.com/kennycason https://www.instagram.com/kennycason/ https://twitter.com/kenny_cason
The only difference is that I don’t record anything after. I find that just thinking about it a few times after I wake up is enough for my satisfaction. Dreams are very powerful tools for thought that I think society could benefit more from.
There is also of course also doing them for the pure enjoyment of them. For example, I’d wager many people would prefer a psychedelic experience over being drunk. Much in the same way that people may prefer marijuana over alcohol.
I was then very surprised by the long battery life and now also use it to watch Netflix.
Something else I find is when speaking to many of my Chinese in-laws I regularly get various stories and explanations for words and phrases. Sometimes they are straight forward and sometimes there are literary or historical references that I would have never been able to derive on my own. :)
I’ve been wanting to work on a 2d game world generated off similar constraint algorithms. But also allow some tiles with high entropy states to be able to occasionally “flip” and propagate around, thus changing the world dynamically as you’re walking around.
And I shall name it Wave Function Collapse since it’s clearly not controversial.
There is the beauty of emergence which is a pattern being highlighted over and over. From the math patterns emerge the basic microbiological patterns, which then emerge the more conplex macrobiological patterns, which then leads to humans. And then the author shows us humans also being a substructure of the larger pattern that we may call society or humanity. He shows this in capitalism as well. He seems to reiterate that at the end of the capitalism video by flashing back to the mechanical components of capitalism being not much different than the mechanical components of a human. He then also discusses the evolution of the mind I’m guessing as he mentions the emergence of the digital mind.
As we explore further, we realize all these thoughts are coming from the mind. There is a had barrier between mind/body or objective/subjective reality. There are also messages of hope that humanity transcends its current weaknesses (war, conflict, etc)
And he then concludes with his thoughts on the nature of the universe(mind?) being open-ended and unlimited of options, ever changing.
Everything he brings up is at some point related back to various philosophical principles, with of course, the story being mostly told by images and sound instead of words. Which I appreciates as well.
All-in-all, I found it a beautiful story.
Regardless, I’ve always been impressed that the Chinese can make such a bold change as their written language yet here in the United States, I’m still arguing with people who don’t know how many feet are in a mile as to why we should switch to metric. :)
If I ever get around to making my “hyper language”, I’ll be sure to post or let you know. I imagine it will likely be “not-very-user-friendly”. haha
I initially learned traditional Chinese characters (lots of Taiwanese friends), and the traditional variant that Japanese used. Even though initially I was stubborn and would claim that traditional characters are more beautiful or pure, I have to admit that simplified Chinese is definitely a major language improvement. My one exception is I still like to write 龍 instead of 龙 :)
I agree with you that there must be a newer/better way to construct a Chinese-like writing system that isn't quite a burden to both learn as well implement in computers (fonts, etc). I.e. Words could still be built up of logic word roots , similar to current system but more consistent/logical. More advanced words could be built of simpler words. Some of my favorite examples are words like "skull" that are in Chinese 骨头 (literally "head bone"). These sorts of constructions for me as a foreigner learning Chinese are amazing. I'm able to memorize so many Chinese technical/science terms that are a pain even for natives in English.
I sometimes have imagined training a neural network to generate "word vectors" that are actually just small 32x32 colored images, just to see what they would look like. Sort of like the word2vec generations, but using images as the input and the output would be a sort of viewable "character". I also imagine "hyper-intelligent" beings developing languages like this, only with higher dimensionality of input and not only images.
Though, as a native English speaker of course my English (alphabet) reading speed is faster than my Japanese (Hiragana/Katana) speed.
What I do find very interesting though is that given I know all/most of the words in a Chinese dialogue, I have noticed that my Chinese reading speed is close to on-par with my English reading speed. I find Chinese very efficient to read/parse. I think there are many factors that contribute to this such as well defined word roots, similar sized characters, relatively small number of radicals (larger than alphabet of course), very simple/clean grammar. The more I study, learn, and use Chinese, I really wish Chinese was the international language. It's power and elegance always amazes me. Even more so as I get further into Chinese literature, poetry, culture, humor, etc.
I've studied Japanese/Chinese both for a long time (10-15 years). Nowadays, I use Chinese everyday as that's the language my wife and I use.
As a pure alphabet goes, I really like the Korean implementation. I was able to mostly learn and retain it with only 1-2 hours of study.
Many of the ES queries fundamentally aren't meant to have a 1-to-1 equivalent in SQL as ES's goal is to specialize as a distributed search index, and not a general relative database.
If your point is that ES is being more frequently used as an alternative to just writing/scaling/using a SQL service to it's full potential, then I can somewhat understand the sentiment.