656 karma · joined May 31, 2017
https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/incident/chinese-serbian...
Political harmony is a problem if forced, but a common vision shared by much of society is a strength if arrived at through healthy, intellectually honest debate.
Political debate is fine and healthy, but it should not be possible to end a debate by being louder, more obnoxious and more ready to do violence than the other debaters.
This of course has a lot of political implications, but if we wanted to do it we could.
E.g. how many billions of euros were collected within a week after the Notre Dame burned? At the risk of offending a lot of french I will say that the Notre Dame is just a building. In the big scheme of things it is not important. Nobody will starve if it is not re-built.
The problem is 'mental inertia', convenience and (perceived) risk aversion.
Would a cheap room temperature superconductor bring any benefits here?
At the very least if these sites are being used for official communication that might be critical to peoples safety some sort of privileged status or ToS should be negotiated. Can you imagine Musk banning some random non-USA government agency because he had a fit while high at 3 am?
Also: https://xkcd.com/743/
I'm not sure whether that's good or bad. I guess it depends on what you are accused of.
Of course, IANAL, do your own research, etc.
In college/university a fairly big part of the education was learning what was compulsory reading and what was optional. There was always more reading than hours in the day.
Let's make it so everyone's body is 25 until they suddenly painlessly die around age 125 or so.
Is this different in some way from natural gas? Why can't we use the existing storage and distribution infrastructure for natural gas for handling hydrogen?
With that analysis internet literacy becomes a question of showing people that official recommendations are not actively trying to trick you into doing something harmful to yourself. How will that be done when nobody trusts any official authority, be it government, universities, news media or anything else?
This trust will take generations to re-build and currently it doesn't seem like anybody thinks it's even a priority.
In some cases the down payment can be a bank loan at significantly higher rates. I did this for my house and the rate for the down payment loan was something like 8% while mortgage was 2%. I forget what percentage of the total was a bank loan but it was around 10-15%.
There are not the same conditions on the bank loan, though. E.g. a bank loan can in theory be called in with a months notice, while this is not the case for the bond based mortgage.
This is how it works in Denmark for property mortgages. There is security in the house and up to 80% of the house price can be lent. It's up to the credit institution and bank to decide whether to approve you for the loan based on an expense budget provided by you, pay slips for the past 3 months and the property valuation. Bank provides the contact between you and the credit institution as well as budget vetting, the credit institution sells bonds to investors to raise the money for the mortgage. Risk is spread over the bond series and is carried by the credit institution.
We have some of the lowest mortgage rates anywhere. Current 30 year rate is 5%. This is after a huge hike in the last year after having been at 0% or even negative for at least 5 years.
So yeah, for large investments like property mortgages with considerable security drop the credit rating and spread the risk across enough people. On average it will be cheaper.
I'll speculate that since it's compression and decompression (as opposed to phase change) that's being exploited, you need a small gas whose behavior is as close to the ideal gas law as possible. Smaller gasses are also more volatile and leaky though, so there is probably some tradeoff.
These flourinated organics don't break down in nature, they are known as 'forever chemicals'. They just stick around and get concentrated as they climb up the food chain. Like dioxins, the best way to get rid of them is burning them at sufficiently high temperatures, which apparently not all industrial incinerators reach.
I guess if enough of this stuff is pumped into the environment eventually some fungus or something will learn how to decompose it, but there will be a lot of cancer case before we get there.