They should be thankful the dev community is giving IE10 a go and actually being encouraging to some extent.
97 karma · joined September 27, 2012
They should be thankful the dev community is giving IE10 a go and actually being encouraging to some extent.
Windows has ABSOLUTELY dominated the world (in numbers, at least) for over two decades and is still #1. What's your problem? Not enough attention? Not getting enough hipster love for your c0rp0r4t10n?
There are 2 stories about Windows and one about Microsoft on the homepage. Boo hoo?
People thought the RT was slightly heavy to hold as a tablet. Will be interested to see their opinions of this.
Apple does overcharge on memory/disk upgrades (as does MS, just look at the ahem 32gb Surface with 16gb of free space).
But generally I find Apple a solid buy.
"Even hardware from Apple is a subscription, in a couple of years it isn't going to work with the newer stuff".
Well... duh, but goodluck finding a company with a much better record on this front.
And how is Apple non-innovative for "pumping out the iPhone" compared the Android world with hundreds of failed models, or Windows with its reluctant shape shifting on what constitutes a good smart phone.
I like Woz, and he did a good job fielding some very biased wording in the questions - but really, it's been a long time since he was at Apple.
Metro feels like compromise to keep people tied to the desktop.
If you can confirm the price tally in the final step of checkout it would work well.
So server side integration still required.
I can't see this massive Android flood being based largely on OS loyalty.
Given the cheapness of some of these phones, would not surprise me if many users had low interest in their devices beyond the phone and basic web/app use.
Does IE10 allow itself to software update?
If we could just have a proper implementation of that, it might mean avoiding a rerun of IE6 lingering for several years?
They are doing quite well on PCs in the modern era.
And you mean, skip the analysis and read the punditry?
They could shuffle on as-is for years and still be OK, unless you interest lies only in doubling your money.
Steve didn't have yearly "big things"
It would be healthy for them to stabilise and lower expectations.
But screen size, and resulting element scaling, IS one of the most important things.
This is if you believe in non-zoomable design. If you allow the user to zoom, one option would be to deliver full desktop design and content, as you prefer.
This does not ring true.
It's the nature of things, and should not be an issue if the responsive design is done properly
I'd argue detecting iPad 2 in landscape mode would be an opportunity for an extra RHS column
While on Mini, you'd just drop that
Shame we can not have that possibility, as the extra 19% of screen makes an extra column readable.
Do you program your WebSockets in railwayjs?
Does Rails 4.0 depend on it? Or will it be a 4.x thing?
Just trying to get my head around this, since some of these changes seem quite integral?
It should be expected.
People wait to see what is available.
Of course there will be a flood of Amazon/Apple/Android sales.
This does not tell us which one got the most sales.
Regardless, Apple may of got the bigger profit.
Yes but he us upfront about that. He isn't pretending it is a well researched review. He is writing about his experience.
ALSO - the UX issues he found are quite apparent on casual inspection.
And the inevitable vs PJAX conversation (ie: is it flexible enough? Does it need to be?)