And promotion and bonuses! This is the major impetus for these efforts.
21,755 karma · joined July 6, 2015
I'm Jerry2 or Jerry3 on many other social services.
And promotion and bonuses! This is the major impetus for these efforts.
Quick inspection shows that it was done with tree.js. Neat!
Even Moderna's CEO Stephane Bancel does not discount it and say's "it's possible" after researchers found a genetic sequence in SARS-CoV-2 virus which was patented by Moderna three years prior to pandemic. [6]
[1] https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/
[2] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353547700_SARS-CoV-...
[3] https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRASTIC
[1] https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/hungary-ban-grain-exports-...
[2] https://www.wthitv.com/news/global-nitrogen-fertilizer-short...
Choice quotes:
>We know this both because dark matter is merely a placeholder for something we don’t understand, and because the mathematical formulation of particle physics is incompatible with the math we use for gravity. Physicists knew about these two problems already in 1930s. And until the 1970s, they made great progress. But since then, theory development in the foundations of physics has stalled. If experiments find anything new now, that will be despite, not because of, some ten-thousands of wrong predictions.
>Ten-thousands of wrong predictions sounds dramatic, but it’s actually an underestimate. I am merely summing up predictions that have been made for physics beyond the standard model which the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was supposed to find: All the extra dimensions in their multiple shapes and configurations, all the pretty symmetry groups, all the new particles with the fancy names. You can estimate the total number of such predictions by counting the papers, or, alternatively, the people working in the fields and their average productivity.
According to her, and many other physicists, there hasn't been any major progress in phenomenology since 1970s when Higgs boson was postulated.
[1] https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-present-phase-...
[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/19/nuke_plants_to_keep...
So does the US. But in the US, neo-Nazis are not in our government, the Congress and in top military positions. They are extremely powerful in the Ukraine and are dictating policy.
Everything that Mearsheimer stated would happen to Ukraine has now come to pass. He predicted it perfectly 7 years ago. He was not wrong. Neocons and Liberal Imperialists, as he calls the "war party", have now sacrificed Ukraine and left them to be massacred by advancing Russians. If you want to debate any of his arguments, please do so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion
There are photos of them doing the Nazi salute [1] and videos of them flying the Nazi flag on the front lines. Even human rights groups have complained about the arms sales to neo-Nazis [2].
https://ukraineatwar.blogspot.com/2014/11/nazis-in-azov-batt...
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/rights-groups-demand-isr...
They already sent a message [1].
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/43828/undersea-cable-c...
Hope they fix these issues.
They have lobbyists [0][1], and you don't. But don't worry, "experts" and oligarchs tell us that corruption here is among the lowest in the World.
>Using lobbying, the revolving door and “dark pattern” customer tricks, Intuit fended off the government’s attempts to make tax filing free and easy, and created its multi-billion-dollar franchise.
[0] https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-turbotax-20-year-f...
>The biggest obstacle, the New America experts warn, is the lobbying power of Intuit and its allies.
[1] https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-10-21/california...
Over the past year, I've noticed that quite a few repos that I used to track have disappeared. I keep a local bookmarks list now because if a "starred" project is removed or DMCA'd, Github does not tell you about it and they remove any mention of the repo from the "starred" list.
SponsorBlock. It changed how I consume YT. It has saved me a ton of time.
Hi sfink. Thank you for a response. I still use Firefox myself but I've been disillusioned by the Mozilla's (mis)management in recent years. I think we will find out more about this "deal" with Meta in the next report and whether they have contributed anything to Mozilla. I find your theory about Mozilla teaming up with Meta to oppose Google interesting. But I don't see why Mozilla would rock the boat and upset their biggest customer.
As for Firefox' 'out of the box' privacy protections, please take a look at this academic paper that I've linked in another comment [1]:
Specifically, section 4.2.4 on page 238:
>Firefox is least effective at reducing third-party tracking-and-advertising requests. This is unsurprising, as Firefox’s enabled-by-default “standard” tracking protection “blocks fewer trackers”.
[1] https://petsymposium.org/2022/files/papers/issue1/popets-202...
We investigate the request behavior of each browser
(Figure 7). Brave is the most effective at reducing third-
party tracking-and-advertising requests; its claim to (1)
is supported. The other privacy-focused browsers vary
significantly in terms of reducing third-party tracking-
and-advertising requests. Firefox Focus and Ghostery
differ significantly in how much they reduce third-
party tracking-and-advertising requests, but the perfor-
mance of both supports their claims, (1) and (2). Fire-
fox is least effective at reducing third-party tracking-
and-advertising requests. This is unsurprising, as Fire-
fox’s enabled-by-default “standard” tracking protection
“blocks fewer trackers” [79]. It errs on the side of caution
in what it blocks, focusing on restricting tracking cook-
ies, social-media trackers, and fingerprinting scripts; it
does not block other content (loaded ads, videos) that
may perform tracking [78, 105]. Thus, while Firefox
claims (2), its blocking of tracking and advertising is
limited with its default settings.
This is quite disappointing given Mozilla's marketing around privacy.[1] https://petsymposium.org/2022/files/papers/issue1/popets-202...
FTA: >We’ve been looking to apply privacy preserving advertising technology to the attribution problem, so that advertisers can get answers to important questions without harming privacy.
Mozilla's is basically looking for a unicorn.
If they really cared about user privacy, they would have shipped an ad blocking and anti-tracking tech in their browser by default. However, if you look at where their revenue is coming from, you quickly realize why that will never happen.
No, read my comment again. Every one of the links shows a completely legal way to grab someone's data from any company. The whole point of my initial comment was to point out that legal system is so well primed against any privacy pushback that it's irrelevant what data is encrypted in transit. All the repositories and databases are just one NSL away. And NSLs are so easy to get that you don't even need to convince a judge to approve one.
From EFF: https://www.eff.org/issues/national-security-letters/faq
>By using NSLs, the FBI can directly order companies to turn over information about their customers and then gag the companies from telling anyone that they did so. Because the process is secret, and because even the companies can’t tell if specific NSLs violate the law, the process is ripe for abuse.
>A judge does not have to approve the NSL or an accompanying gag order.
>Over 300,000 NSLs have been issued in the past 10 years alone. The most NSLs issued in a single year was 56,507 in 2004. In 2013, President Obama’s Intelligence Review Group reported; that the government continues to issue an average of nearly 60 NSLs every day. By contrast, in 2000 (the year before the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act that loosened NSL standards), 8,500 NSLs were issued.
It's a catch-all term for all the law enforcement people. There's now so many organizations that can get your data through warrants, and some even without warrants, so that's a convenient term to use. And especially if you're not a citizen/resident of the US since the Fourth Amendment does not apply to you. But it's not like the 4A has stopped them or slowed them down anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcement_officer#United...
NSLs: https://www.eff.org/issues/national-security-letters/faq
Dragnet/Geofence warrants: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-tracked-his-bike... and https://www.logically.ai/articles/geofence-warrants-on-the-r...
Dragnet/Mass-surveillance keyword warrants: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/googl...
Dragnet/mass-scanning of online storage: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/12/20/googl...
PRISM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
RAMPART-A: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAMPART-A
Forced backdoors into "encrypted" email: https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/08/tutanota_backdoor_cou...
And who knows what else is still secret. A good rule of thumb is that if something's in the "cloud" or hosted on someone's computer that you don't directly control, you should assume that LEOs have access to it.
When all the data is centralized, you don't care about the end-point encryption. All you care about is having access to all the databases.
I heard some comedians say that they don't perform in Canada because of the same type of anti-free-speech laws. Maybe some Canadians can chime in but there are cases of comedians getting charged with hate speech laws.
Not even the military is safe anymore:
>Trust in the military is dropping significantly, new survey suggests
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2021/03...
You could describe the dystopian part of our condition as a blend of various dystopian tropes: https://i.imgur.com/kDo2NNr.jpg
Which of these is most dominant depends on where you live.
The reason why it looks like a Toblerone bar is because they decided to use through-hole electrolytic capacitors (because audiophile reasons) and the battery was round too (an 18650 IIRC): http://mikebeauchamp.com/wp-content/gallery/pono-teardown/ca...
The triangular shape and inability to carry it comfortably in jeans pants pockets doomed it from day one. I'm amazed something like this passed the design stage. And first encounter with user testing would have made it crystal clear that the shape was a no-go. Yet it not only got funded but was also mass-produced. It was a massive waste of money.
Also, an interestring video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6O2T_-4Wls