173 karma · joined June 26, 2019
It makes sense if you want to sell a dream that now everyone can become developer and it is cool that non-tech people can now generate todo apps tailored for they own use. But when working on complex project, that is used by real paying customers you need to be responsible for the code you are producing no matter if it was written by AI or by hand.
Thats why i think we would be better with deep integration with IDEs instead of having separate window I need to alt-tab to to do something. I really liked first approaches (IIRC first release of Copilot worked like that) where you put comment inside code describing what function you need and AI would just fill it in. That way developer is still in charge of what is happening. For bigger tasks create new file and describe what should be happening and let AI go wild with it, splitting work into more files as needed.
Currently Jetbrains kinda supports that flow but it is clear that it is not their main focus, so I find it kinda lacking.
How could LLM's work better without LSP when LSP is something don't interact with?
Can't agree with this enough. The moment i finally understood what pointers are was when I landed embedded job and during debugging session I looked at memory browser that showed my variable at exact address in memory. After that all about pointer arithmetic and even function pointers became clear as day. Something at least 3 teachers weren't able to explain clear enough.
No gun will save you during genocide if you are a target. Best case scenario you kill few attackers and die anyway.
Also medicine is very broad field, it's probably hard to stay up to date in every new study. Especially that academic research is filled with less than ideal studies, so not only you need to read and understand them properly, you also need to make sure that source is trustworthy.
Provided there is anybody with very rare combination of being developer proficient in whatever language was used to write this software and who knows how Torah is read/sang
Isn't the point to actually reduce quality by using imperfect media so recording has more oldschool vibe? Kinda like all the lo-fi mixes being so popular today. At least thats what I always thought, I didn't really research that at all.
Art is just something we do and consume for fun. We don't need to make art more efficient, because there is already too much art to consume in a lifetime. Also there is no requirement to consume as much art as possible. And automating art making means that there will be even more average art that anyone interested will have to sift through to find something nice.
Overall all of this effort could be put into automating something that will make everyday life easier, like if you want to make art more accessible then for example automate translations so we can read books or watch movies that we previously couldn't.
Is it so hard to just let someone complain about something? Everyone can have their own opinion, i don't know why some people want every single one to be positive.
[0] https://twitter.com/imetatronink/status/1605389284369784832
Thats actually dangerous way to use ChatGPT. Since you don't know the real answer you won't be able to tell when it gets something wrong.
Point is art itself
It wouldn't be similar at all. It takes years to get skills good enough to even copy stuff like that. With AI person who never did any art in their lives can get hundreds of copies in few hours.
Is this official position of some jokes association? I wouldn't want to laugh at unfunny joke.