JaimeThompson

Please see https://www.celestis.com/about/conestoga-1/

SpaceX and Tesla would have crashed and burned had it not been for government, of all levels, subsidizing them. Something that, now that he has benefited from it, Musk is against others having.

>successful companies from ground up in fields no one was even looking into.

NASA, ESA, and all the other space agencies might disagree with you here.

They do, you may also find this [1] interesting, it doesn't cover the starlight navigation system but the 19,000 piece Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere (AIRS)

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30254/this-isnt-a-sci-...

The rate at which the moon moves away from the Earth isn't constant. I can't find the details right now so I could be totally wrong.

I am very curious, please do!

Yes because in may Southern US states no enforced lockdowns happened.

It depends on the location if it was mandatory or not.

>hordes of Californian nutjobs (Diane Feinstein et. al.)

Lots of people from other states, including Texas, in that list too. It wasn't just a California / Left issue.

How do I get details on the design changes that make it less reliable as a consumer?

>it is very simple to accomplish.

Given you don't have details on the quality of the item you are buying how do you accomplish that?

>There's nothing wrong with income inequality. People are just envious.

It isn't envy some feel when they can't afford medical care for themselves and those they care about. This applies to a lot of things in additional to medical care.

If they ultra wealthy lived under the same system as everyone else then perhaps, but they don't. They have oversized influence of most every aspect of our lives which isn't conducive for a stable democracy.

These, sometimes, look a little better than electrical tape. I haven't used this brand, it was just the first one I found. [1]

[1] https://www.amazon.com/FLANCCI-Blocking-Stickers-Dimming-Bla...

How are you defining woke as you use it here?

>SADS was not a thing until the medical cartel started disseminating this lie through their co-opted legacy media channels.

[1] "Seeing “the better way” to disseminate and educate, the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes (SADS) Foundation, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) charitable organization, was established on December 12, 1991 by Dr. Vincent and several dedicated colleagues and LQTS family members, for the purpose of helping to prevent sudden and unexpected cardiac death in children and in young adults."

[1] https://www.sads.org/about-us/sads-foundation-history/

>But the vaccine failed >It does protect against serious illness though.

This isn't a binary fail / no fail condition.

>incrrasing neuroticism and mental health issues

I would argue that previous generations had such issues as well but they just didn't get talked about as much. It would help explain some of the damn the long term all that matters is the next year / six months type of thinking.

What percentage of farm land does Bill Gates own?

Are you able to form mental images in your head? I'm wondering if people who can't have more trouble with such things.

Perhaps the urban areas should grow their own food?

For many years the GOP platform has called for the end of gay marriage so asking that is valid.

Does everyone have equal rights to marry in a conservative town?

Here is a bit about Prasad, but it's a complicated subject so this doesn't present the entire picture. https://cancerletter.com/the-cancer-letter/20211008_4/

Smoking weed makes you lose your security clearance, Musk did it on camera and still has his because of "reasons". That is one example of the rules that apply to most others not applying to him.

How are you defining "Woke Progressives"?

The courts of today don't follow libertarian principles which changes the outcome of my little what if.

A decent amount of libertarian ideas run into issues like this where the assumption is that current non-libertarian systems will keep them in check but this sort of mixed system isn't what a large segment of libertarians appear to want.

>how the philosophy that at least tries to remain consistent with the ideal of not aggressing on the life, liberty, or property of others receives some of the most derisive comments.

If you combine the libertarian idea that a property owner can fully control what happens to their property along with the idea that the right to contract is absolute what happens when the entity that owns the road in front of my home says I can no longer use it unless I shop only at his stores?

A lot of libertarian ideas simply do not work when combined together due to human nature to enrich themselves at the expense of others.

He didn't say zoning, he said homes so I was asking them why a single family home was elitist.

>Suburban single-family homes are specifically an elitist policy.

How so?

> if we can't bear trivial negative consequences

The people being exposed to all this aren't being compensated in any way, any medical problems or other issues they have to fully pay for themselves.

Might be different if they got taken care of.