JackSlateur

Nuclear is a sane, qualitative and working solution to a real problem

The only solution known yet

Is there anything more to say ?

About waste: somehow, this is a solved problem (at scale) ? Fast breeder reactor, half life ~= 30 years (IIRC)

From your message, I understand that your country fails to build nuclear plant in a timely fashion but that other (china) can. Seems like a lack of skill/willingness to me, not a technical issue.

I dunno, China seems to be doing exactly that

Perhaps the self-induced costs can be volontarily reduced and not inflated ?

Thank you for this very detailled and instructive post

.. what ?

People are working on problems I cannot manage (who could have known) and they cannot say anything about that but we have to trust them to bring results out of thin air ? Is this politics .. ?

If your personal accusations can be boiled down to : "shame ! you are not gullible!", then please know that, here in France, not being gullible is a compliment.

"please ! please ! stop ignoring me ! look at me, look at me ! I'll set the house on fire if you do not pay attention to me ! also, give me all your money!"

Could you share us a proof of concept or anything that might be a solution for the heat dissipation in space, at scale ?

You see, this is the difference between bullshit and not. I can claim "we'll do timetravel soon !", but unless I share some "things" (whatever they are) that might sustain that affirmation, this is just bullshit

Does it mean that no solution exists ? No. Just that today none are known (as far as I can tell).

It would be a shame if a rock came out of nowhere and hit that many square kilometers stucture

Luckily, there are almost no rock in space.

That's the neat part: you don't (ergo, this is yet another marketing crap)

4th solution: nvidia vgpu

If I remember correctly, the idea is that you have a physical GPU and you split its memory (with, eventually, time-budget) to create multiple virtual GPUs, which can then be associated with a KVM guest and use by it

(not available legally on consumer-grade GPU)

Multiple theories, pick one

First, easy: there is money to be made, so why not try it ?

Second, more elaborated: AI is god on earth (we know that for certain: it has been said); AI will replace all humans in the next 6 month, since 2023; AI somehow sucks (today); Ergo, and this is very logical and the only conclusion, shared by all sane people: "they" are undermining us to rob us from delegating our work to AI (for free, because it costs nothing, and never does); Shame on "them" !

Wild guess: packet forward is implemented in hardware while arp/nd is software, with probably some things (think "hardware interrupt" or something alike) that allows hardware to "call" the software stack (for instance, when the link-layer addr is unknown)

So, to implement what you said, we need more than a simple router upgrade: we'd need to change the hardware, so that when a packet is forwarded from a source that's not in the mac table, the software can (asynchronously) perform an arp/nd lookup

There is probably a world of issue behind that behavior, but I do not know

quote:

  I see unpilled people.
  Where do I see them? Everywhere. The majority of people have not taken the first pill.
  Most people have no idea what frontier AIs can do for them.

Yeah; Perhaps people do see the propaganda that "frontier AIs can do for them" and choose to dream of a better world, another world, a world where human-kind does better than slop;

Port numbers are convention

A "security engineer minded approach" would be: own what is executed on the box;

"You just don't like that women have won a few battles recently."

Everyone can burn the house. Not sure how this count as "winning a battle".

("women" are not the only people doing that, seems to be the new game in town..)

niquest is something like a one-man-show, which is an issue-per-se

Of course, it is clearly superior to everything else (being authored by a french guy !). But sadly, some people do not accept this simple fact :(

We take food very seriously :)

In rust, is jit equivalent to an "unsafe" block ?

Switched to Qwant because of that .. (corporate laptop does not allow changing the search engine urls, only changing the engine itself)

Honestly ? Not a stressy move, the major things that changes is that the IA bullshit is gone

GC, zero instructions: that's funny; JVM used to "stop to world" to process that zero instructions;

  LLMs can re-write and cross-translate software really well.

Is that was true, claude would be written in Rust;

t-string main use case is SQL (for instance, in psycopg¹)

You can write things like that without SQL injection:

  t"INSERT INTO mytable (first_name, last_name) VALUES ({first_name}, {last_name})"

This is a very pleasant feature, very useful

[1] https://www.psycopg.org/psycopg3/docs/basic/tstrings.html

Tech is not the issue, people are

"If figuring out what to build is the hard part, why do so many product managers seem clueless" - because people

"LLMs may be good at coding" - they are not;

  "Python still does not address the issue of dynamic typing and the inability to test correctly"

This is wrong, you can enforce typing on Python (pypi: typeguard)

The only issue with Python is performance, which is only an issue if you need performance.

You are not alone

Have you considered the theory that, perhaps, you are the one with skill issue ?

   You don't need that meeting if you're not writing the code.

I am responsible for a software that carries a multi billions company.

My mates are not, their code editor are not either : I am.

Yes, I could be a clown and be accountable for something I know nothing about. I choose not to.

Not everybody is a cruft-engineer .

Well, for those of you who want to decrypt exchanges, plain-HTTP is best suited for you.

Assume your stance :)

"when you are raped, just say that you consent ! Consensual sex is better than rape!"

Congrats, you solved the situation (irony)

Pretty sure rust can run on browsers;