1,020 karma · joined February 19, 2012
> Wow! I honestly wasn’t expecting that much of an improvement. We shaved 187MB off the app size in five minutes by stripping framework symbols.
> I also learned that “impossible,” when used by Feynman, did not necessarily mean “unachievable” or “ridiculous.” Sometimes it meant, “Wow! Here is something amazing that contradicts what we would normally expect to be true. This is worth understanding!”
The classic chicken and egg problem
Wasn't familiar with this video myself, so I searched it up. Passing it along for the next person:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byQrdnq7_H0
I like the message as well.
So I was reading this comment and thinking to myself, how does one even pronounce "ai"? Language is not my strong suit. After searching the web, I found out that "ai" is a diphthong and it sounds like "eye" or the letter "i". Leaving that info here for others who may be confused. Sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyKgPH0kmrU
Well, I think the answer to your question is Google is trying to be friendly to the layman. It's not hard to think of examples where the user inputs a something into the search box that a CS major knows will not result in the implied wants of the user. Google tries to do a lot of human to machine translation work, and I think you're seeing the result of it. That being said, you can use quotations to explicitly include terms.
For others who hit the wall. https://outline.com/VYJEa5
Can confirm it's not commonly used in North American english. I can't say I've ever heard it used like this before
Can anyone explain to me what reflexion means in this context?