221 karma · joined January 9, 2017
Although I think trying to convince vendors they want less data seems a little naive. More likely they'll lock out work like this entirely to make sure the free floor maps of your house (and schedule, and pet presence, and...) keep coming.
I honestly doubt that was ever the case; it certainly makes everything else posited seem a bit orwellian.
I'd also like a citation.
Some of the spending, for instance: https://www.jsonline.com/in-depth/news/2021/07/14/weve-spent...
They're simply people who get paid for making music well. Often as part of a performance.
Promotion and marketing isn't generally what they do.
People is the important word in the question.
They still had all those mediocre (as in long in the tooth) arcade games but also original games (full RPG and complex strategy) more like computer ports.
The dark horse contenders were the actual "general purpose" computers. That worked out well but took quite a bit longer to play out than the consoles in gaming popularity. Less accessible I suppose.
"Massive failure" isn't exactly how I'd term that.
That's what made me assume it was a whole stack rather than interface to a backend.
I'm guessing an ESP of any stripe would be a low bar for measuring and networking a tube up.
Better? No idea. Although there might be less to screw up unless someone cost-saves by not installing the spec tape (it really is necessary).
BIND, NGINX, Postfix, Apache... they all have excellent documentation on setup and securing.
I'm curious which aspect your seeing as poorly documented. Perhaps some specificity would help others point you at a reference.
The conclusion I came to was that when there's few people and they're all manually whacking at wood with axes you're (as a group) okay. When the wood collection is essentially strip mining a forest for millions of customers it just isn't the same thing. Not really comparable.
Manual labor and using an axe is an efficient system in the sense that it ultimately limits use and production of wood per person.
The rest is true enough and I'd add that there wasn't anything nearly as rugged at the price (used Toughbooks, or that style, were more expensive).
I still recall how to build a Linux system from go. Coding what you're working on up in Python/C would take a large unrelated amount of knowledge.
Fifth gen x86 processors were around 1994. So I'd guess earlier than that from the age of the machinery they're using.
But the 486 was seeing use in 1990. So after that but before 1994 would be my guess.
It's possible it was ongoing litigation at the time.
Also it looks like they're referring to the VS100.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAXstation
I never had access to those but I'd conjecture from the post they might've used tape. There at least.