[1] - Lanier, Jaron (2013-03-07). Who Owns The Future?. Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
1,226 karma · joined September 22, 2009
[1] - Lanier, Jaron (2013-03-07). Who Owns The Future?. Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
HECK YEAH, WE're 5 !
[1] - Scoobypedia
511 ( startups ) 11(.)5 (B)
for it to be one " startups " , decimal and B have to be parsed out ;-)
This goes from the very top end of town to oblivion. Because, at the root of it is that gotcha.. money for nothing.. many know how the rest of that song goes.
Rebels eventually wish to be kings. Some actually get there. Then the cycle repeats.
My worry here is that individuals are paying more attention to specific actors who as powerful as they appear to be are not as formidable as systems they represent.
Its almost rare to see such wounded attitudes from an equally matched adversary.
The other direction is full scale martyr which was also displayed recently .. I'd rather not take the name to avoid pain for those close to the kid.
But yes, being an entrepreneur is an added layer, as you've to learn to arrange people to attain a larger goal than just research.
And he shows signs of that even on the jobs page while avoiding the broken method of interviewing that is oft practiced, he's almost defining a boundary for relatively high signal from the applicants.
His fluid approach is reminiscent of the caper that the Google guys pulled at Stanford.. and as it turns out, I think he also got funded by Larry.
The Big and Little Oh of this story are both extreme events.
Glass if one thinks about it deeply is something unnatural.. microscopes, telescopes, vision impairment correction or shade from harmful sun.. or immersive , time disruptive experiences like a movie.
So the key barrier that glass concept is going to face is user rejection beyond the initial bubble crowd. Average people already have a certain context in which they find artificial inputs acceptable ( TV etc ).
Our distinction between natural and artificial sources of audio is different to visual.
I may be entirely wrong and Google may change the habits of a lot of young kids .. that is actually a rather strange and terrifying thought.
[1] - Conti, Greg (2008-10-10). Googling Security: How Much Does Google Know About You?
" Fox " " con " nnnnnnn
-- my thoughts --
I am sure it was.. but the main point is.. people attribute more rationality and objectivity to a process that frankly even by pg's own comments ( check out his essay on " two kinds of judgment ) is not so.
Investors ( even incubators ) should be a secondary thought to an entrepreneur's path.. I'd go so far as to point that its best to have a defensive approach and look for paths do not require them ( even pg has hinted many times via his essays.. including the cockroach bit ).
What happens when the first example arrives that clearly just bypassed the whole lot of the present ecosystem till a very late stage and hits the range of a Google or Microsoft ?
" We missed Dropbox, Heroku and Airbnb. " [1]
If the 3 supposed hits that presently created most of yC's entire known value got passed over by the VCs at first go.. one has to be a bit skeptical about the whole idol contest.
[1] - http://rapgenius.com/Harj-taggar-well-be-circling-back-lyric...
" The Morlocks could have descended from today’s social network or hedge fund owners, while the ancestors of the Eloi undoubtedly felt lucky initially, as free tools helped them crash on each other’s couches more efficiently. What is intriguing about Wells’s vision is that members of both species become undignified, lesser creatures. (Morlocks eat Eloi, which is about as far as one can go in rejecting empathy and dignity.)
source : Lanier, Jaron (2013-03-07). Who Owns The Future? . Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
" To be completely cured of newspapers, spend a year reading the previous week’s newspapers. "
" The best test of whether someone is extremely stupid (or extremely wise) is whether financial and political news makes sense to him. "
" There is a certain category of fool—the overeducated, the academic, the journalist, the newspaper reader, the mechanistic "scientist", the pseudo-empiricist, those endowed with what I call "epistemic arrogance", this wonderful ability to discount what they did not see, the unobserved. "
" Daily news and sugar confuse our system in the same manner. "