ExtraE

I just tried this (firefox on iOS, new england). Google asked for my location and I said “no”.

TLDR: 2 ads, the rest organic.

Top-2 were ads, a maps widget, organic result, people also ask, 4 organic results, people also search for, images, 4 organic, 1 ad.

Linked elsewhere in the comments: https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/

(2015)

#1 and 2 are both very important.

I think the good will comes from YouTube doing something useful for the user with the collected info (video recommendations).

Interesting. IANAL but is saying “we have to do this dumb workaround because of xyz” criticism under (US) fair use?

One way I’ve found is to quote the thing I’m citing. Context and length dependent, of course. This also has the advantage of showing how the doc looked when you write the code, so the comment rots less slowly (and if something changes, you can see by comparing the excerpts)

I disagree. This sounds like a reasonable summary. Or perhaps: “[parent]. However, technological improvements have enabled safer nighttime flying, and so Australia is starting to incorporate it.”

Heh. You didn’t have a perfect example but you went with what you had and shipped.

Perhaps it’s 2-use?

Yes. I don't think rewrite everything was what the original author was arguing for, either.

Is there space in the world for an all new (v2) set of porcelain commands? (IMO yes)

As a side-note, I wish I could give lastpass a regex or pattern or something to check auto-generate guesses against (it would be great to have a [trusted] library of these, too). I often end up regenerating or tweaking my auto generate settings a few times for every new account I create to get around this stuff.

I mean, outside of small-startup environments, who cares? Do I have a moral responsibility to care? Maybe. Do I have a real reason to care outside of that tenuous-at-best ethical reason? If you believe the author's piece, no.

I mean, the threat model is that 1. Memory leaks/errors are bad 2. Programmers make those mistakes all the time 3. Using memory safe languages is cheap Therefore, 4. We should use memory safe languages more often

I mean for websites to get paid at all this has to be the case. It could by your browser, os, whatever.

Haven’t checked if this is a reputable source, but:

https://www.tubics.com/blog/youtube-revenue/

I suspect the answer will be paying a bit more for internet and having ISPs forward that fee onto websites.

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/792/

Your point in the floating-point discussion is true, but you’re wrong about this one- linguistics is a descriptive field, not a prescriptive one.

The article says you can manage them from a WD site.

Anyone got a link?

I’m confused by the edit- WD is Western Digital, no?

I’m not sure I disagree, but e-waste maybe?

You joke, but LG makes a <3lb (1.36kg) 17” laptop. That’s impressive. (I can’t vouch for its quality, I don’t have one).

Samsung makes a 15.6” laptop that weighs 2.6lbs, which is extremely practical. I’m planning on getting one. I wouldn’t be if it had the bulk and weight of a removable battery.

When did google buy the .youtube TLD? Anyone know how to view a list of corporate TLDs? (Yes I know they’re mostly owned by ICAN anymore and all therefore corporate in some sense).

Awesome-n: auto scan GitHub for awesome-n lists and create awesome-n+1. Although 2 of these in a fight wouldn't be great.

I mean, your point is a good one but those are bad examples.

The printing press was made to print bibles in bulk.

The internet was made by the DOD and universities, not to transfer large files/images but for small text documents.

Solar came from LEDs which were discovered by accident by scientists working on other semiconductors (trying to find something useful), but to your credit probably explored because it was interesting. 99% of the work done on solar now is to do something useful.

> (ps sorry for the over use of first person - just wanted to share my perspective)

Why do you feel bad about/dislike first person (in this context)?