487 karma · joined September 30, 2021
Sure, a refrigerator requires intelligence, whereas loose carbon atoms do not.
What about everything in between? Methane? Complex hydrocarbons? Pointy sticks? Things that look like crude tools?
It’s about defining a metric that can measure complexity across a wide range of things you might encounter, to help estimate the odds that it was produced by something simple yet alive, or something complex and alive, or something alive but not very smart, or something kinda smart, or something super smart, etc
- No homegrown semiconductor industry: isn’t the recent hand-wringing over the new Huawei chips proof of the opposite?
- No interest in training LLMs? Is that true? I thought Baidu was already on it?
In fact at every major AI conferences, Chinese R&D groups like Baidu and Ant group are major participants (and sponsors). I am talking about conferences like NeurIPS and AAAI, which both happened in the past few months.
EDIT: the comments of that article are also confused by that article, lol. Is there a joke that is going over our collective heads?
I’m not in sales so I have no idea about the expected dealmaking rate, but if she really were subpar, the people doing the firing would have had a much easier job. They wouldn’t have hemmed and hawed and said they couldn’t discuss particulars, etc, they would have said exactly what you said, “by your own admission you failed to close any deals, the expected dealmaking rate is X many deals, etc”
This is America, new taxes are nearly impossible to pass, tax cuts are much easier to pass.
Market cap of NYTimes is 8B, OpenAI is 80B, MSFT is 2.7T, you do the math.
It’s quite obnoxious :P but, that’s the only time one interacts with sales staff or even trainers. After that it’s pretty smooth sailing.