I'm curious if we as humans would be more deceptive to climate change if we would still have nature based beliefs
18 karma · joined December 17, 2023
There are probably plenty of examples of kids in foster care who do not share those behavior patterns
It would unite us more and based on science and not on some arbitrary thoughts.
So in the spirit of it: happy winter solstice everyone! (I know I'm 2 days late)
You can already see this in a lot of kids and recognize their parents through it.
It's effort.
The mass will filter through this by popularity.
And good people/artists will be able to learn faster, more and iterate faster over ideas.
For everyone else who actually doesn't care that much, they will get similar content cheaper.
After all there are so so many people watching normal TV daily with a ton of advertising or blindly radio which delivers the same top 50 list over and over.
And I made that 18 years ago.
I had to change my intel q6600 only after upgrading my camera as Lightroom grinded to a hold with the bigger raw files.
Besides the Mainboard / capacity apocalypse ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague?wprov=sfla1 ) I'm genuin happy with how well older things still work.
The entry barrier got so much lower with learning overall.
Humans just don't care in avg how shit works.
Illegal means that we don't want people to help, it means we don't want them to do something between don't like it.
Otherwise it doesn't make sense that the result is jail as jail is for punishment (it shouldn't) and not for rehabilitation.
But the last few years they became noticable used.
This year in a outdoor it event I had to check the display wall behind the speaker to check it out.
It was full color, fast, bright (we are talking no cloud hot bright summer day and that display was in the sun and it was LEDs!
Crazy impressive
It's a question when not if as it's clear that we haven't found fundamental issues.
The opposite happens: more people use it already than I thought and companies are stepping up with insurance to cover you.
Yes the Tesla car driving into a truck, horrible but there was no genuine global outcry.
Make out of it whatever you like, science tells us that climate change will erode our infrastructure and it will cost more than not doing anything.
On the other side even the egoistic view would give homeless people money just to have them of streets.
While it's definitely bare, and the weather was often shit, it's my most favorite conference
I think it's doable but not a lot of fun. You will have to walk from one lecture to another outside, lots of crowding in plenty of spots.
Public transport is also full.
But there are two bigger rooms (one old one new) with good talks you can always go to
YT is cheap like hell.
It has one of the most diverse high quality content I know.
Way of entry for producers/creators is tremendously low.
YT löst a lot of money for years.
If we are not even able to pay 12$ / month for YT what do you want? Everything for free adfree?
France has cheap energy and a lot of electric heating.
Guess for whom a heat pump might be the next best thing?
Yeah French people.
East Germany nuclear power plants were shut down due to security risks.
Chernobyl was a fucked up crazy event here too.
Even now you need to test meat from animals when they are shot I a certain area due to unhealthy levels.
And while France build 56 plants we never build that many in the first place.
And countries still struggle to build them. Olkiluoto 3 was planned to be done after 4 years, it took them overall 18 years!
And yes we are a democracy and a lot of people in Germany don't like to live next to a nuclear power plant.
France has the double of density btw.
Stop writing simple comments for complex issues