And in another case it downloaded data through a publicly available free to download data, but then it rehosted the data elsewhere which is against the terms of service.
86 karma · joined August 4, 2021
And in another case it downloaded data through a publicly available free to download data, but then it rehosted the data elsewhere which is against the terms of service.
Capitalism abides by your dollars not your voice.
So people can decry ai all they want but if they keep using it, it won't go away.
Even then it's probable that AI is a big enough productivity boost for certain industries that even if no consumers used AI, businesses would still prop AI up enough for it to live on.
About 5x more kinetic energy.
Bad any other car been there, probably including Tesla, the poor kid would have been hit with 4-10x more force.
AI already saved me from having an unnecessary surgery by recommending various modern-medicine (not alternative medicine) alternatives which ended up being effective.
Between genetics, blood stool and urine tests, scans (ultrasound, MRI, x-ray, etc), medical history... Doctors don't have time for a patient with non trivial or non obvious issues. AI has the time.
People just don't want to do that
For example, a sub-agent for adding a new stat to an RPG. It could know how to integrate with various systems like items, character stats component, metrics, and so on without having to do as much research into the codebase patterns.
Otherwise it would check the tests are passing.
.a { color: red }
.b { color: red }
Also it saves on parsing time I suppose. And less to zip and unzip.
The type of thing I'd add to a projects deployment stage and never touch again unless it causes an issue.
The price is ads or paying for a paid service like YouTube premium.
So you're still stealing, you just convince yourself it's ok, and that's fine.
And many roundabouts still need lights because lights prevent gridlock which roundabouts do not do.
You just shouldn't tell someone it's their fault for being raped and murdered by terrorists. That's less ok.
So yes it is true that your phone and it's pin/biometrics are ultimately the most important thing for security. But passkey on your phone is no worse than the previous state.
It is true that you do need to be rich enough to own a phone and ~100 USD of something else (laptop or USB), which does put redundancy out of the reach of a large portion of the world. But then they can just use regular 2fa at the expense of not being phishing-proof.
The boxing and jiu jitsu perhaps.