1,348 karma · joined July 3, 2016
Of course, the division famously lost $10bn, and so they must be reducing compute. But the fall has been noticeable.
It is an odd way of calcifying late-20th century American upper class anxiety. If we can't give the engineers a different moral goal, it will become the default mode of knowledge. A more immediate problem than "AI will kill us" is the dev teams determined to avoid "erasure" or "digital genocide" or whatever they'd call a race/culture-agnostic AI.
And, to be fair to the dealers, there is a long history of the makers trying to screw them over, and the public, too.
It's not quite as efficient, but I put in a recirculation pump and a timer to keep the water warm throughout the pipe during the day. The clothes washer was never getting warm water, and we wasted a lot at the shower waiting for warm water to reach it.
Water in pipes inside a house's "thermal envelope" is presumably around 72 deg. F. I wash my hands with "cold water" without wincing. Tap water strikes me as tepid if I drink it without ice.
If your pipes run through an outside wall in Canada, it might be a different story.
If you do need warmer water, and the bidet heats it, you probably just need an electrician to fish a wire and add a receptacle. That's not outrageously complex, usually, but I tend toward calling a professional for anything behind the walls.
In the US, the water pipe almost always connects to the toilet through a small shutoff valve. After the valve, it connects to the toilet through a "supply." The supply is basically a short garden hose, with screw-on connections at both ends.
Shut off the water at the wall. Flush to empty the toilet tank. Unscrew the hose at the toilet, and screw that end into what amounts to a y, or splitter that comes with the bidet. From the splitter, screw one side back into the toilet connection; the other goes to the bidet itself. Turn back on the water at the wall.
(This is for a simple cold-water bidet. If you need heated water or electricity, it can be more complex.)
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/puerto-rico-governors-ra...
The point is that there isn't enough time in the universe for all the random stuff to happen that scientists pin on random chance. The theorem was memorable, but a cop out.
And yet she seems resigned to students maintaining “dialects” that make it difficult to talk to grandparents, and impossible to read the “old white men,” while she cites the phone as a reason:
> Linguistically, the dialect of English spoken by contemporary adolescents is rapidly moving further away from the vernacular of the canonical works we ask them to read. While this has always been true to some degree, social media and technology have sped up language evolution and widened the gap between English dialects.
It's easier to extract the formal statement of the rule against perpetuities from a reddit corpus, than to apply the rule to an artificially complex fact pattern in an essay question.
So, GPT-4 scores closer to the bottom of people who pass the bar the first time. In other words, it matches the people who cull the rules from texts already written, but who cannot apply it imaginatively.
When you see the branding story for, say, Google or Pepsi, that looks like money flushed straight down the toilet.
Except this kind of work spawned a nation of clerks and it has lasted a thousand years. Everybody has to think about the King's values, and implement them in their own little corner of the kingdom.
If Joe Biden changes his heraldry, it doesn't change my post office experience one whit.
Yes, they are hard to prove, but the jury gets to take that into account. It could have picked almost any number ($1m, $10m, etc.) for reputation damages, but that would go in the "actual" damages line on the form.
The "punitive" damages really are just to discourage future bad conduct. And it will be difficult to support the idea that it takes a $1m penalty to prevent future bad conduct worth $1.
The Supreme Court has said punitive damages must bear a reasonable relationship to actual damages.
As a rule of thumb, 10:1 is usually unconstitutional. 1000000:1 is off the charts.
Wrong Word in Contract Leads to $2M Malpractice Suit[1].
[1]https://lawyersinsurer.com/legal-malpractice/legal-malpracti...
"ChatGPT, give me the highlights of these ancient Greek scrolls ..."
But, the prison releases do seem to indicate he was in a forgiving mood; I imagine release of the brother couldn't be accomplished without some formal process. "The one jailed for treason? I'd like to see that order in writing."
Which has probably kept me from comparison price shopping cell service quite so hard.
If you're not doing well enough to pay the lawyer for custom advice, use the example of people who paid to get it right for them.
“Arguably, the Harvard system was a disappointment every day since 1636…”
I can't quite tell if this applies to military convictions. That would be the other area where the Federal government takes the time to prosecute something as minor as mere possession or use.
Another interesting question: does this actually pardon, or is it more like an open call for applications? It looks to me like you'd want to get that pardon certificate from the WH Pardon lawyer well before the next election.
Universal Music didn't sign the contract, and it went to Germany's court.
In the US, the contract terms would normally bind the _parties to the contract._ Contracts are sometimes called "private law," as opposed to "public law." But in some circumstances and places, the government just declares the contract or provision legally void. Then, even the parties to the contract can't rely on it.
He doesn’t want the product at the current price. It’s a bad value for him.
You’re requiring the consumer to want management’s goal. But product survival is not a buyer’s goal. The buyer has limited money, and wants his own profitability.
But the board seems to have a weak hand. It can decide to disappoint the for profit investors. But it doesn’t own Sam, or the vast majority of the workers, and maybe not much of the know how. And they can walk if the board disappoints them.
The board’s altruism might be great, but it lacks the legal tools to do what it wants, against organized labor backed by unlimited capital.
People hold IP in LLCs all the time. Obviously, though, the outcome depends on TW law and its loopholes as much as the IRS and state law. And the cheapest US LLC services just won't have any clue about any of that.