2,931 karma · joined August 28, 2015
Essays on technology, philosophy & amateur neuroscience:
www.autodidacts.io
A portfolio of sorts, listing some of my web projects:
www.curiositry.com
@curiositry on GitHub/SourceHut and Twitter.
It would be great to see a side-by-side comparison of Cerelog and OpenBCI data from the same session/patient.
A few questions:
- Could you clarify which parts of the project are licenced MIT, which are CC-BY-SA, and which are CC-BY-NC-SA? It seemed like the guide and the README had more restrictive language than the actual license file.
- What made you decide to start fresh, rather than adding the features you needed to the OpenBCI?
And I still get a steady trickle of grateful comments/emails in response to a tossed-off post about getting Linux scanner drivers working, many of which are genuinely moving to read.
Re blockers:
- Novelty: I routinely search for very niche, "boring" information, and am disappointed by how few in-depth blogposts I find.
- “AI can explain most topics better than I can”. I doubt it! I rarely find current AI as valuable as a good blog post. It tends to be shallow and regress to the mean, and b/c of hallucinations it's untrustworthy, so a lot of time is wasted fact-checking.
- Fear of shipping: if it isn't relevant, nobody will read it (unless you're already famous)
Re questions:
- What made it worth it for you?
Clarifying my thoughts, connecting with strangers who think about the same things, the leverage "having a platform" produces (it opens a lot of doors), and gaining prestige in certain niches.
- What kinds of posts actually worked (for learning, career, network, opportunities)?
I don't think this is simple to answer until the heat death of the universe. Traffic stats is a very poor estimator of value delivered. Which posts I am most proud of, and how much traffic they got, are weakly correlated.
- Any practical format that lowers the bar (length, cadence, themes)?
Things that you are obsessed with. It's a tonne of work writing a good post, and sometimes you publish it and nobody cares, so it has to be intrinsically rewarding.
- If you were starting today, what would you do differently?
I don't know! Probably put less effort into trying to appear intelligent/impressive, which rarely works anyway.
These are my off-the-top thoughts based on over a decade of blogging.
I've been running it for over a year, but now I have fixed it up and made a little landing page to see if there's interest for a stupid-simple price watch service like this (no need to install an extension or create an account):
Then it was placed in news.ycombinator.com/pool (https://news.ycombinator.com/pool?next=43176091), and got two comments; credit_guy's comment was one of them.
Then, today, it hit the frontpage.
Notice that if you mouse over "9 hours ago" on the story it shows the timestamp 2025-02-25. 9 hours ago was not 2025-02-25. If you mouse over the "7 hours ago" on credit_guy's comment, the timestamp shows 2025-02-26. One day after it was submitted, two days before it made the frontpage.
I think you're right in some cases (when working in a field one has mastered, for example), and I think I could probably go in the direction of getting it right the first time.
But the way I see it, any time I'm doing something new or innovative, I'm doing something I don't know how to do, which takes trial and error; and troubleshooting is basically figuring things out by trial and error, in a systematic way.
Though a lot of time it is used for fixing bugs, I think troubleshooting as a skill and mindset is equally useful for creating new things, where you are solving for something.
I also really like the philosophy of Bear Blog and Matoara Blog. I don't think Bear has newsletter sending, but Matoara does.
What alternative alternative term do your recommend?
Though I mentioned humour and fitting in, you're right that I didn’t really address the use of profanity to build rapport/break down formality/establish intimacy, and adjust the tone of a conversation in other ways. (Some aspects of that were on my list of things to add, but I never got around to it.)
> I get the feeling this guy doesn’t have too many close friends.
Thankfully, despite this essay & other indications to the contrary, I have a reasonable number of wonderful close friends (I’m sometimes as surprised as you), some of whom swear, and some of whom don't. I sometimes appreciate swearing, and sometimes find it grating. But I find that overuse of swearing usually detracts from a conversation, which is why I wrote up my argument for why there are potentially maybe possibly valid philosophical and pragmatic reasons for adults to consider swearing less.
The essay got rather bloated trying to address all the possible counter-arguments, the scientific research, and the potential caveats; and despite my efforts to tone down the moral grandstanding, a lot slipped through. I should probably re-write it as a shorter essay with a thousands footnotes, "Why I Don't Swear".
> suggesting that everyone should always be worried about offending others nearby, instead of expressing themselves when they need to.
Always worrying about it wouldn't be healthy, but to me it seems like a good idea to at least consider the potential negative effects self-expression may have on others, and weight that against the benefits of self-expression.