http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/191-E-El-Camino-Real-SPC-2...
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2150-Almaden-Rd-SPC-125-Sa...
164 karma · joined January 24, 2015
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/191-E-El-Camino-Real-SPC-2...
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2150-Almaden-Rd-SPC-125-Sa...
Although, this really shines a light on the fact that it probably isn't necessary for technology to attempt to optimize every human experience.
http://time.com/money/4317132/boss-wants-liver-donor-for-bro...
I'm kind of making fun, but they don't want to fix the problem because those tickets are a genuine revenue stream for the city. When the revenue from parking tickets goes down, everyone panics.
See http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/06/news/economy/nypd-tickets/
I don't agree that this isn't invasive. In fact, based on the current heated discussions going on regarding societal and corporate responsibilities around privacy, I don't believe I'm in the minority on this one.
Citation? The author of the article writes this directly after referencing a Microsoft blog post that doesn't contain that statement.
"Cure for Cancer Around the Corner, If You're Filthy Rich"
And...
If You're Alive in 30 Years You Might be in 1000 Years Too, If You're Filthy Rich"
See? Clarity is king.
the guy who was forced to write the code didn't speak to their managers about potential implications
That isn't really the way things work in an agency/Fortune 500 relationship. What really happens is something like:
-> the development manager attempts to translate the implications of said software to an account manager who is directly responsible for client communication -> the account manager has little idea of what the development manager is talking about, which does not stop them from attempting to translate in turn to the client's marketing team -> the one tech representative from the client company listens to the translation in abject horror, knowing that any questions they ask will never be adequately answered -> everyone goes out for drinks on the agency's tab
This isn't a raging critique of the process, it's just what normally happens.
That said, Verizon got fined for a good reason.
Even so, Amazon's flavor of content curation has been a major part of their success story, and they mark their top 500 reviewers with a special tag for a reason - customers derive value from it (it's a badge of trust, in a way).
"Amazon Bestseller" and "Top 500 Reviewer" are concepts that form a large part of Amazon's brand and value proposition. Regardless of whether this is a bug that can be quickly patched, they should pay more attention to things like this IMHO.