422 karma · joined December 11, 2013
Google's processes, however, is hands down the worst thing to exist for the scale they operate at, and it's not even close.
I'm doing this today in https://github.com/Cidan/ask -- works great.
https://www.reddit.com/r/googlecloud/comments/vy8hx3/ama_wit...
Come join us! Also, hi Moles :)
We have very strict and very well engineered data retention systems. When we say data is deleted, we mean it. Various levels of automation ensure the data is purged, and all data is tracked meticulously for violations across every datastore.
It's one of those systems I wish we talked about more -- it's a marvel to behold just how much work goes into retention policies and the automation that drives it.
When he got to the part of the form that asked if he has ever consumed drugs, he said "yes" as he should have by being honest. The follow up question asks something along the lines of, "If yes, will you ever consume drugs again?"
The jack-ass decided to answer "I won't not do them again..." We fired him a few days later.
(Disclaimer: I work for Google)
I agree. One of the most amazing things about watching this project unfold is just how quickly it went from 0 to 100 with minimal overhead. It's amazing to watch companies and individuals push the boundaries of what is possible with just the push of a button.
Disclaimer: I work for Google Cloud
Disclaimer: I work for Google Cloud.
Literally the first three words.
You would think! I live in Santa Monica, California, and we have exactly that in our downtown area. The retail shop turnover is insane -- a large amount of shops come and go from the area, despite the massive amount of foot traffic the area sees every weekend (and most weekdays during the summer).
AWS does a lot of things right, and we're more than happy to go toe-to-toe with them in the areas they have us beat. Competition is a sign of a healthy economy where everyone benefits. How can you compete if you don't even try to match the people you are competing against?
Disclaimer: I work for Google Cloud.
It's pretty amazing.
You still have to grow the filesystem it self though, so if you're trying to grow the root mount, using a partitioned disk, and not using an abstraction like LVM you will need to reboot to be able to use the full disk.
Glad to see AWS catch up in this area.
I was under the impression that everyone used the fully featured official docker image (https://hub.docker.com/r/gitlab/gitlab-ee/). We've been using this for over a year without issues now. Is there a reason you need the unofficial version? Does it do something different?
Well, yeah. That's 28,108.80 a month if you're running queries on demand and don't want a delay/coordination in Amazon instance creation/destruction.
BQ may or may not be as fast, but it's truly a managed service; I give it our data and it just works. I don't have to worry about instances, boot up time, maintenance, hourly costs, etc. It's silly to focus just on query speed when there's a whole layer of management and cost that comes with it.
If legislation at the federal level were to apply a weaker standard for who can not be covered by a non-compete clause, a state can still expand coverage to all jobs.
We use a unirepo for all of our Go work, and being forced to use the vendor directory would be a massive headache.
If I could go back in time, I would use RethinkDB for our actual product.