796 karma · joined August 10, 2017
I've been upgrading the same Ubuntu server across LTS releases since 14.04 - now on 22.04 - without any major issues. Spending 30 minutes every two years to upgrade major versions isn't that big of a lift.
They're changing all their documentation to match their new announcement: https://www.reddit.com/r/Helldivers/comments/1cjlnn1/sony_tr...
https://grammar.collinsdictionary.com/easy-learning/what-are... https://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/punctuation/apostrophe/...
Do I need a PSN account to play PlayStation games on PC?
No, you currently do not need a PSN account to enjoy PlayStation Studios games on PC, but you will need a Steam account to redeem your voucher code. Some of our PlayStation Studios titles also offer incentives for linking your Steam and PSN accounts.
However, adding a requirement (it was previously optional) is boneheaded, maybe illegal. It must be terrible to be Arrowhead; they have to sit by and watch while their player base implodes because of a Sony edict.
It's 100% acceptable to be suspicious of foreign nationals hailing from a country that is currently at social/political/military odds with one's own country.
Why should I have to be OK to have a sidewalk on my property when it lowers my property value? Why should I have to agree to have utilities be buried in my yard if it might lead to a loss of use if said utilities need to be repaired? Why should I need to be OK with housing that will give people a place to live if it means I have to endure more traffic?
I again ask: is it desirable for any of those countries to be able to unilaterally force a company to enforce its laws regardless of where the individual in question is?
Would you want authoritarian governments to be able to demand Cloudflare stop serving those they consider criminals that are outside their borders?
International law is messy.
I have extremely fond memories of playing Theme Hospital back on my PS1 but it does have some rough edges.
This isn't mutually exclusive to being concerned about the US government actions in this space but the risks are completely different.
As an example, some (terrible) ISPs intercept NXDOMAIN records which could leak into misconfigured networks that are squatting on unregistered gTLDs. This behavior would be far worse if they did this for the proposed .internal.
That being said, copyright is a product of laws and laws can always change. Your comment made me believe that the copyright owner somehow extended their rights; not a literal act of Congress.
Given that Signal is free as a service, supporting federation only increases their expenses.
Taken to the extreme, someone should not be able to record every currently-legal moment of your life using any means using the same legal argument as hiring a PI and/or a helicopter.
As someone who was an (alternate) juror on a Federal "pill mill" trial, they are. That trial was truly eye opening to how flagrant some doctors are when it comes to writing bogus prescriptions.
The doctor in that trial had deals with imaging companies to create justification for egregious prescriptions. I'm talking about starting people on 160 mg/day of oxy for relatively minor "injuries." Several pharmacies reported the doctor which helped get the investigation rolling.
On the ZFS note: it's been rock solid for me with Ubuntu but a living nightmare with Arch. My Arch update would upgrade the kernel but then OpenZFS would semi-routinely incompatible resulting in an unbootable system.
This is not really what the decision states. The government can request all it wants but it cannot partake in "threatening, pressuring, or coercing social-media companies in any manner to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce posted content of postings containing protected free speech".
I'm personally OK with the government requesting things to be moderated; I'm not OK with the aforementioned methods if the request isn't backed by law.