10,031 karma · joined March 4, 2016
I have a blog: https://karl.kornel.us/
My HN handle is also my Twitter handle.
My work email is a!k!kornel@stanford,edu (with ! removed and , corrected).
Microsoft's Authenticode has been doing this for a long time, allowing a signature to be considered as valid long after the signing certificate expired.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/seccrypto/ti...
* It gives an indication of how much you need to grow before this Postgres functionality starts being a blocker.
* Folks encountering this issue—and its confusing log line—in the future will be able to find this post and quickly understand the issue.
DHCP option 42 (defined in RFC 2132) can be used to specify multiple NTP server IPv4 addresses.
(There’s also DHCP option 4, but that’s used to specify the IP for the older RFC 868 time protocol.)
DHCPv6 has option 31 for SNTP (via deprecated RFC 4075), and option 56 for NTP (via RFC 5908).
So, that would probably be the best option: Get an NTP address from DHCP or DHCPv6, use that to set your clock, and then do whatever you need!
(Yes, it does require that you trust your DHCP source, and its NTP reference.)
If a regulatory agency is also doing investigations, they may choose to focus less on their own 'failings' (that is, their agency's rules/guidance or lack of rules/guidance), and focus more on others' failings. Or, they may choose to focus less on other agencies' failings for political reasons.
Having a third party, with no regulatory ability, helps to reduce the appearance of bias, and increase trust in the industry that the third party investigates.
One other thing that interests me, the English Wikipedia page on Judo Bank (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judo_Bank) has an interesting note at the top: "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use."
It's an interesting experience, and it (or some portion of it) is one that many folks do every workday.
How recently is recently?
BART’s SFO station opened June 2003, and the OAK station opened November 2014.
* Regarding the sealed food, I have reported faulty packaged-food items to the manufacturer two or three times, and in each instance was provided with a coupon for a free replacement.
* Regarding the store not having an item that they thought they did, you may find that there was no agreement in place requiring them to make it right, especially if no payment was exchanged, or if said payment was refunded. You may be limited to the “court of public opinion” that is Google Maps reviews etc..
But for the other two items, small-claims court, optionally preceded by a strongly-worded letter from a lawyer: You may find that an hour of lawyer time is worth it, to write such a letter and to generally act as a ‘sounding board’ for your issue.
You can read about California Fictitious Names here: https://calosba.ca.gov/for-small-businesses-and-non-profits/...