45 karma · joined August 13, 2016
"randomly disconnecting from their host" has been going on for years.
...and while it's comical watching various people running around in circles on various tech support sites, being told to "update their drivers" or "modify their power settings"
I'm happy that perhaps consumers will finally get some justice, and force these idiots to QC and properly support their products.
"Instead of approving the request, Manuel asked the company whether the Maui Fire Department had requested permission from a village elder"
Escaped slaves had bounties placed on their heads and were often captured and placed back with their owners.
Fugitive slave laws
https://infogalactic.com/info/Fugitive_slave_laws
Now do you see how preposterous your point is? It's important not to live in a far left shithole state, where property rights are not taken seriously, and which do not have stand your ground laws.
(also, your link has nothing to do with squatters, it has more to do with laws surrounding intruders. In Texas the homeowner would not have been charged.)
Why is the Washington Post never "mistakenly" deplatformed?
Perhaps some day scientists will resolve this mystery.
I understand that libertarian logic uses gray areas as a means to an end of furthering their ideology, but that is not an issue for me.
Actually, YOU have just made an excellent point unintentionally, not everyone has the time or desire to read a long article. IF you prefer more longform content, then you can go to any number of platforms which specialize in that.
Twitter is what it always was, a quick take or bite-size morsel of information.
So, I'm giving it to you now. This is just smart and logical. You do not need technical proficiency to reason out the risks, or the daily "12yo exploits MOST-SECURIST-EVER IOT device in 20 minutes" articles.
With that said, without public support, and government laws, this is a losing battle.
Equifax had no authorization from you to collect and distribute your financial data, but they did it anyway, and your financial services sent them the information. And of course, not surprised, their criminal negligence, revealed EVERY SINGLE ACCOUNT to hackers. Let's be real, when the news for stupids spins the story in this manner:
Equifax data breach: The number of victims may be impossible to know
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/09/17/equifax-data...
It means that the number was so great as to be unspinnable, so they went with another narrative, "Nobody knows" like dark matter, it's impossible, our scientists are trying but it's impossible....lol
This appears to happen with any proto-monopolistic entity. The problem is, unlike government protected 'businesses' like cell phone and cable companies, there is no monopoly in the Banking sector.
So, WHY, why are people still drawn to the lowest common denominator big banks for their accounts? It makes not sense.
I'm leaving this month from my own big bank, after their "FREE" online banking as long as you don't bother us, e-checking account, went from free to $12 a month.
Usually, if google developed the project in house, they will shove it down everyone's throat, whether its successful or not.
The reserve the 'bye felicia' for competitors they buy up and then destroy.
The only thing I would correct in your "Financial Corruption Process Map" is the step after #3:
.
3.5 "big fish" start buying up politicians and lobbying firms to legalize more and more "bad behavior"
4. Megabank acts legally to do something "reprehensible" since they lobbied to legalize it.
4.5 financial collapse. scandal...then the hand wringing begins by walking corpses in Washington.conclusion: Bankers are above the law.
They should be in jail, along with the CEO. This isn't just white collar crime. This was blatant, premeditated, financial fraud. Directed from the very top to every single Wells Fargo office.
How is the public so stupid and uneducated, as to not be outraged?
All this does, is help to motivate the next generation of sociopaths. Zero consequences.
So excuse me, if I don't hold the same love affair with the liars in chief, both current and former.
Dispensaries legalized in their respective states continued to be raided and robbed throughout the Obama administration, one has only to witness such a scene, where local police and sometimes even elected officials look on, as the federal government marches in and destroys a legal business.
Marijuana law up in smoke as agents raid dispensaries
https://mg.co.za/article/2008-08-11-marijuana-law-up-in-smok...
there was no 'resistance' back then because Obama was the chosen one, who would lead us all into a golden age. Well, Obama's gone, and he didn't change shit in regards to drug laws, or at the very least neutering the DEA.
However, aside from my arguments from very limited first hand experience, there is also, oh right, all those pesky facts. Poor, powerless Obama, he's a victim!
Obama’s War on Pot | The Nation
https://www.thenation.com/article/obamas-war-pot/
(you can google search statistics yourself. i'm not going to list out links to someone who is clearly stuck on "talking points" from some publicist.)
However, he loved using the DEA as tool when it suited him:
The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-d...
That's pretty cool, I'm used to things being like the archaic TechDirt commenting system...
"How dare you claim IBM's Watson isn't BREAKTHROUGH?!"
"How dare you not want the same buggy useless software which powers siri and cortana to now be used to drive cars?!"
What are you cynical reality based folks talking about! Saudia Arabia granted citizenship to it's first robot. Clearly you hate science! If AI wasn't real yet, why would they do that!?
Lifelike 'Sophia' Robot Granted Citizenship to Saudi Arabia https://www.livescience.com/60815-saudi-arabia-citizen-robot...
---
“Watson is a joke,” Chamath Palihapitiya, an influential tech investor who founded the VC firm Social Capital, said on CNBC in May.
A Reality Check for IBM’s AI Ambitions - MIT Technology Review
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/607965/a-reality-check-fo...
Why Everyone Is Hating on IBM Watson—Including the People Who Helped Make It
https://gizmodo.com/why-everyone-is-hating-on-watson-includi...
Is IBM Watson A 'Joke'?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2017/07/02/is-ib...
---
The final article, is the most telling, in its revelations. Of course, you must speak the language to understand IBM's gartner magic quadrant-esqe based reasoning: Their argument is because a bunch of businesses they convinced to sign up have 'Watson' stamped on their engagement contracts, it's PROOF that Watson is breakthrough technology, catapulting research into a new era of big data and machine learning....lol
I'm not saying some of the things that IBM claims it does, cannot be currently done, but I no doubt at all the IBM is not doing it, and Watson is most certainly behind closed doors a complete joke.
As I recall, the article in WIRED from like 20 years ago, talked about how he missed his dad, and how in the future you would be able to take a room full of all his dad's old crap, and AI would be able to recompile his dad into dad 2.0 in the cloud!
(he didn't use these terms but that was the gist of the ridiculous and absurd WIRED article interview with him.)
Why do I bring up Ray? It's because circus acts like Ray and the Singularity University, sold a bunch of people certain goods, which were VASTLY overestimated in terms of delivery times, and in terms of the good themselves.
First of all, many folks don't want to admit this, but WE MAY NEVER BE ABLE TO CREATE A SYNTHETIC CONSCIOUSNESS! I think we will eventually, but it's definitely not a certainty. It just may not be possible for a completely synthetic 'consciousness' to exist.
This type of hype has become almost religious in nature, just like the folks who really think Moore's Law is an actual scientific law and not just an observation and prediction based on very limited data.
In conclusion, you'll get your AI just like those folks in the 50's, or was it 60's? ...well anyway, back when they had those world's fairs and predicted flying cars.
We're just not there yet. We don't even have basic foundations to build this yet. There is always a possibility of a brilliant individual, who may leapfrog humanity, but for right now, it's just vaporware.
AND YES. Even IBM's Watson and Google's GO winning "AI" are just vaporware machine learning and big data sets, it's not AI even a little bit.
Sorry folks, I love futurizing, and inventing words ;) , just like everyone else, but... if AI is in the stadium, we aren't even in the parking lot.
---
And now, after my rant, I shall read this article since it looks really interesting. I'm surprised it's on Medium.
...oh you must have replied right as I was deleting.