I think it was this: http://motioninjoy.com/download
725 karma · joined February 10, 2011
I think it was this: http://motioninjoy.com/download
It seems pretty specific to me. If you have evidence, present it.
I can see an argument for it being too broad, but it saddens me that a question such as this is closed when it has the potential to be very interesting.
I suppose it also has the potential to devolve into a giant drugs flamewar, which may be why it was really closed.
> The overriding design goal for Markdown’s formatting syntax is to make it as readable as possible. The idea is that a Markdown-formatted document should be publishable as-is, as plain text, without looking like it’s been marked up with tags or formatting instructions
Which is appealing to me, and many others I suspect.
I actually thought about doing it this way by just importing the bootstrap CSS and extending from the various parts, but I realised elements inside the element I'm going to extend from container won't have the container parent class and thus won't get the correct CSS applied.
Does anyone know of something that solves this?
Over the past year I've felt that the term "troll" is increasingly being confused with what would have been called "griefing" back in my gaming days. My early encounters with trolling were that it was your fairly basic ribbing of friends, nothing particularly malicious. Nowadays, anything and everything seems to be labelled as trolling when I feel that the circumstances with malicious intent would be better labelled as griefing. Not only do I think griefing is a more apt description for the behaviour being associated with trolling, I think it allows for a distinction between harmless fun and out-to-cause-harm when describing activity on the internet.
Proper distinction between the two modes would, imo, help keep frames of reference and hopefully prevent knee-jerk reactions to what is currently labelled as trolling affecting a more wide variety of interactions.
Also, it would probably help a lot when the next newbie asks you what "trolling" means as well.
I've been deploying two projects to AWS very recently and we've been using django-pipeline and django-storages (with s3 boto storage) for asset management. ./manage.py collectstatic and all your static files are up on S3. With a bit of finagling around[1] you can even have user uploads hit there seamlessly as well.
[1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10390244/how-to-set-up-a-...
EDIT: Pipeline isn't necessary for storing static files on S3, but if you want to compile SASS/LESS/cs files or any transforms really it works really well.
We ended up developing both sites in django, which made it easy for them to add copy during development and see how it would actually look on the site. Once finished, we got the HTML output and sent it over for them to put up on their servers.
We were pretty happy with how it turned out, and I think django-medusa being able to automate the whole rendering to html files would be nice if we have to do it again.
I was at a birthday lunch the other Sunday and it was an extended family kind of event, when my mum, who is considerably computer illiterate, was talking about DuckDuckGo. You can imagine my surprise, DDG to me has always been something of a geek's search engine.
Apparently it had been covered by the morning news, as a viable alternative to google. Not only this, the segment was apparently recommending people opt out of google tracking their usage, brought about by the recent privacy changes.
I don't know if you consider their privacy policy change a recent gaffe, but I would consider that story to be an indirect result of those changes.
I guess you have the overhead of the template language and rendering them though still.
EDIT: Added links.
I'll admit I have barely begun to think about the implications so it may be dumb from the outset but I think:
* No transferring to patent trolls
* No situations like the link
I haven't really thought about the opposite side of things, was kind of hoping people here would have strong opinions on the matter.
Yahoo pipes[2] turns the subreddit's top stories .json representation into an RSS feed, and then Twitterfeed[3] posts that RSS feed to a custom twitter account which I can then follow on Flipboard.
I got this setup from http://miguelrios.org/reddit-in-flipboard/ and a handy trick is to combine subreddits. So for example I have the 'SFW Porn Network' reddits all combined using the + e.g., /r/earthporn+cityporn+... etc.
I don't go out of my way to delete people I don't speak to, but I do lose friends over time, either people removing me, or people deleting facebook. The rate at which I lose friends is just slightly slower than the rate that I'm adding friends.
The example of the earliest known burial on the wiki page you linked sounds like one of the specific events we studied.
"The earliest undisputed human burial dates back 90,000 years. Human skeletal remains stained with red ochre were discovered[by whom?] in the Skhul cave at Qafzeh, Israel. A variety of grave goods were present at the site, including the mandible of a wild boar in the arms of one of the skeletons."
vboxmanage startvm "Name of VM" --type=headless
to boot an image up, takes about 10 seconds to be ready to ssh into (You can ssh immediately it just waits till it has booted to connect).
vboxmanage controlvm "Name of VM" poweroff
If you want to turn it off from the outside.
1) That big of an issue? 2) Surprising?
I'm going to say no to both. They're competitors.
Thinking through it more though, I could see that it seems anti-competitive and, thanks to facebook's position in the market, monopolistic. Though it's not as if facebook is the only way to share links to material on the internet so I don't think that really counts.
I wonder if similar opportunities exist in the restaurant space.
The response was overwhelmingly PDF menus, only for the simplicity of the workflow. Despite a demonstration of how easy it was to use the CMS to update the menu they really just didn't want to spend the time doing that.
If you visit http://mysicksite.com/article/1 javascript changes all the links to the #! format. Then when the user clicks the links they enter #! land.
Now the user copies a link from their address bar and puts it into the wild. Someone gets that link, http://mysicksite.com/#!/article/1, and visits it. Rewrite with htaccess or whatever method you employ to serve the content at http://mysicksite.com/article/1, using javascript to change all the links to the #! format.
I posted this in the reddit thread about the Gawker/lifehacker problems recently, but was too late for anyone to really give me a response. For those of you that have worked with these kind of systems before, would this solve the problem the original link was describing?
EDIT: Ahh I think I get the problem now, of course after I post it. Server doesn't get the data from the uri trailing the #! I think?