BitterCritter

Tesla is over valued anyway. People need to dump that stock before it commits suicide in a bunker.

If you are not threatened by an ideology of death, then you are a proponent. Even the suggestion of nazism or communism or feudalism should result in scorn and massive repercussions.

I fear there's going to be a lot more cyberattacks on the US in the coming years.

This memory monopoly is ridiculous! I have maybe 20 free gigs left on my computer. There has to be something really amazing about COD if I’m ever gonna buy a new PC for it.

I’m very confused as to what my $23.45 wallet has to do with what billion dollar Ai companies do.

That’s irrelevant the conversation is about government actions being censored. We can discuss Altman after.

I think that’s a bad metaphor, though I don’t particularly know what you’re trying to say.

This applies to TikTok. We can’t be tolerant of any social media that disallows specific words or groups.

Computer networks do have packet life which I guess would be a fix for this, but don’t quote me I’m not a network engineer.

No, as an autist, this guy is right. I’ve “systematically”thought about it a lot and creativity is something that must be done the long and hard way. You can be creative about efficiency but not efficient about creativity.

If a rule blocks someone from saying something then that rule is for that. There is a specific rule if they couldn’t say it before. What are you saying what does that mean?

I wonder what strange little people this rule was removed for. Sexism just stupefies me and I wonder how someone with the intelligence to breath could render such words.

I think that’s like saying a square is not a rectangle.

You got my exact point and elaborated really well with even research on the guy! Thanks it means a lot.

I think it can be argued that once a seemingly decent, mentally healthy person murders rather than a pervert cannibal or social outcast then the justification for the murder should be reasonable.

It makes me livid when people write that vigilantism is never right. It speaks volumes about how little nuance there is in their own lives. I think these same people would denounce civil disobedience in the time of the civil rights movement and would joke about Seneca Falls if they were born a century younger. The overconfidence disgusts me.

I think we are conflating two different things. Monogamous people and monogamous institutions. Does the author mean institutions are coercive or that couples are coercive?

I think the process of learning is in fact making larger pictures into smaller quotes and this does not help learning in the way that it’s trying to. The process of diluting context is something that fundamentally must happen inside a person and trying to replace that with Ai is contrary to the point.

I do find significant use for this in something like review and considering the legibility of my own note taking, that is one handsome solution.