217 karma · joined October 11, 2021
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Audio_A...
Github for example uses cookies but doesn't ask for your consent:
"At GitHub, we want to protect developer privacy, and we find cookie banners quite irritating, so we decided to look for a solution. After a brief search, we found one: just don’t use any non-essential cookies. Pretty simple, really. " [1]
[1] https://github.blog/2020-12-17-no-cookie-for-you/
Ed: Just checked myself though. Page seems to be saving google and facebook cookies which would definitely require consent.
I understood the technical intelligentsia to be the actual engineers - the people working at FAANGs. FAANG itself are the capitalist class.
Thought this paragraph by Wells was also relevant in that regard:
"I remember the situation with regard to the technical intelligentsia several decades ago. At that time the technical intelligentsia was numerically small, but there was much to do and every engineer, technician and intellectual found his opportunity. That is why the technical intelligentsia was the least revolutionary class. Now, however, there is a superabundance of technical intellectuals, and their mentality has changed very sharply. The skilled man, who would formerly never listen to revolutionary talk, is now greatly interested in it. "
The past 20 years were a period of economic growth. By Well's logic you wouldn't expect the technical intelligentsia to have many revolutionary thoughts during that period anyway.
The canteen stopped serving meat altogether which meant that the famous "VW-Currywurst" wouldn't be available anymore. That's what Schröder complained about, not the availability of vegan alternatives. He actually praised those in the same sentence.
Google is only giving me Allied Irish Banks. Somehow I feel that's not what you're talking about.
Also: Thank you! The idea is definitely derived from Synthesia but that isn't free anymore and I wanted to make it work in a browser :)
I've dealt with this problem in a MIDI webapp I've developed a couple of years ago (midiano.com). If I remember correctly, firefox had some issue when samples were scheduled to immediately start with a gain value above 0. I believe the solution was to schedule them slightly earlier with a gain value of 0 and using "gainNode.setValueAtTime" to make the sound appear at the desired time.
Not entirely sure if that was the exact solution but I do remember firefox causing some problems in that regard. I just recall it being a hacky solution and that I couldn't find a documented explanation of why it happened.
Any website showing a cookie banner already prioritizes their ad revenue over your convenience of not seeing a banner. So why would they implement any extra work to spare you that banner, if you're one of those customers that won't drive ad revenue?
Do you mean the fact that cookies and LocalStorage (or other APIs able to persist data) are often considered the same thing when using the term "cookies"?
I don't work in front-end but whenever I've used localstorage for personal projects it's as simple as getting/setting a javascript object with keys & values.
Like you said, other advertisers would probably happily replace them and even if that's not the case I think a country as wealthy as Germany should be able to find some way to finance bus stops ;-)
Unless I'm completely blanking on these signs being used elsewhere, excluding the bus-stop signs sounds like this will not have any noticeable effect apart from providing a nice sounding headline.
And while I do think that state agencies nowadays have crossed most lines of what may be be deemed acceptable it should still be clear that in some cases it's necessary for a government to have the authority to do things a normal citizen doesn't (eg you're not allowed to sentence people to jail, vigilantism etc).
Also one of the articles is actually about a German court striking down one of the surveillance tactics so this just sounds like whataboutism to defend one nation and bash another. Despite all its faults, concerning spying and data-collection, the EU is likely the smallest offender out of the big players in this world.
But that's the problem in OP's reasoning. Simply knowing that electric cars will dominate in the future is pretty worthless as investment advice. Especially when we are talking about tesla, which's stock price is entirely decoupled from any fundamental values. Today, I actually think that becoming one of many car makers is the best-case scenario tesla can hope for. It was always the question whether they can get enough of a head start in self-driving and battery tech BEFORE traditional car makers start making EVs. Those have decades of a head-start in every other aspect of car making. And to me it seems that most of them fully committed to EVs in the last 1-2 years. So will Tesla's advantage in battery tech buy them enough time to make cars that are as safe and reliable as traditional cars?
Also: I really don't know much about cars, so I might be wrong about pretty much everything I just said :) But it shows nicely that you can find logically sound arguments about future developments which are worth absolutely nothing on the stock market. Just look at the stock market since the beginning of Covid.