BXlnt2EachOther

YouTube gives, I think, 55% of revenue (not just profits) to creators, which could be considered similar to production costs making up a majority of expenses.

Since it's a reconciliation bill, is this likely to make it past the "Byrd bath"? It's looped in with a $500M AI modernization fund but my simplified understanding is that items not related to budget can be challenged and removed. Couldn't find reference to this in any of a few news articles.

also, the pacing of:

"I hope, considering your [pause to check personnel file] over nineteen years of service to the firm you will understand that these measures are in no way a reflection of the firm's feelings towards your performance or your character"

At the unveiling it was promised to start at $39,900, just under $50k in today's dollars.

Yes, that was for a base model that wasn't produced, but we are a long way from the promised stats on the upper trim. Promised to be under $70k, or about $87k in today's dollars (nope), 500+ mi range (nope, 300), payload 3500lbs (nope, 2500), tow rating 14000 (nope, 11000). By 2021 (nope).

It does come close on two of the promised stats: 0-60 in under 3 seconds and top speed just under the promised 130. I'd much rather have it be good at being a truck than being a massive hunk of pointy steel that can be thrown around with that much torque.

yes, the headline is getting ahead of things without the context of the trial. It is not correct -- at least not yet -- that Google "will have to break up its business." This is a DOJ filing for the remedies trial happening this month and/or next. Also correct that Google gets to propose its own remedies. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/public-policy/googl...

Judge Mehta has suggested he'll issue a verdict by August. Then either side can appeal. There is still a lot of legal road ahead.

Wildly speculating, I'm curious if the current Supreme Court would want to set precedent around the interpretation of antitrust law w.r.t. the consumer welfare standard, and whether there's anything in this judgement that would let them do so.

edit: readability

possible context... summoning from NY to LA around January 2018 was a real promise by Musk.

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/686279251293777920

edit: removed talk of downvotes, just providing the tweet.

Ars says "people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that top antitrust officials are planning to ask the court..."

they do some investigation further down but I thought this amount of telephone was amusing for a memo that is rumored to come out later today.

others too

> Sources have also informed MusicTech that Future will be closing Computer Music, Total Guitar, Guitar Techniques and Guitar Player magazines.

possibly unpopular opinion, I trust the bigger companies more than small ones on stuff like this. It would be so much easier to not offer anything, rather than intentionally create a potemkin setting and risk the blowback that would occur if discovered. Hopefully this comment does not age poorly.

full disclosure: worked there [edit: google] a while ago, not in search, not in AI.

If Alphabet/Waymo leadership were more theatrical... I wonder if the Tesla event delay could have given them time to expand 3 miles up the 101, across the Cahuenga Pass, so they could offer fully-autonomous Waymo rides through LA traffic to and from Musk's WB lot Tesla demo.

though it's not at all their style. And realistically I'm glad they're being methodical and prioritizing safety.

Front ports: 2 USB‑C, headphone

Back ports: 3 Thunderbolt 4 ports (Thunderbolt 5 on the top $1399 tier), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet

RAM can be upgraded to 32GB on M4, to 64GB on M4 Pro

10 GbE looks selectable on any of these, +$100

There might be more to this than Google bypassing the site. Quote from a rep was added to the article:

"We’re always experimenting with different ways to connect our users with high-quality and helpful information. We have partnered with a limited number of creators to begin to explore new recipe experiences on Search that are both helpful for users and drive value to the web ecosystem. We don’t have anything to announce right now.

Microsoft obtained a patent for this around the Kinect time, sounded a little dystopian back then but I don't think it was ever used?

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/microsoft-patents-tech-tha...

Yes, the multi-year discount and perpetual license are nice -- though the version is the one from the start of the year but that's certainly better than a lot of peers.

I was impressed that when Jetbrains raised prices, it seemed a reasonable amount, they gave a few months' notice, and allowed people to prepurchase three years in advance at the old rates.

I'm hoping IDEA and the all products pack continue to survive basically as-is. Jetbrains looks to have launched a couple overlapping enterprise SaaS products, the AI integration, and increasingly specialized individual IDEs.

Variation on "have seen" - a couple examples of historically expensive software that became accessible:

Over time DaVinci Resolve went from a hardware-software system costing $X00,000 to having a software-only version for $1500 in today's dollars to having two tiers, a free version and $295 "studio" version that is also bundled in with BlackMagic hardware and cameras.

($800,000 to Zero - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WvP5_HFQSk)

I suppose a half-million-dollar hybrid system might not be off the shelf. For things individual users could actually (edit: realistically) buy, the perpetual Adobe Collection license was $3k in today-money.

For Mac users, Final Cut Pro Studio 1 was $1299 and Logic Studio used to be $999, plus paid major version upgrades; probably multiply by 1.5x for inflation; now they're $299 and $199, or IIRC $299 together in a bundle for students, and they've each received free updates for a decade.

there are many stats from many sources, probably with varying accuracy. And please keep in mind since it's financial, many of them will be trying to sell you things.

There's also a difference between retirement savings and net worth. I'd guess there was a jump in "house poor" millionaires over the last few years.

The Fed has a Survey of Consumer Finances which can graph net worth broken down by perentile. You're right that even $1M net worth is not the majority, but top 25%ile:

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm?mod=arti...

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scf/dataviz/scf/chart...

Probably more millionaires in the last few years with inflation though.

This is all US-centric; the author, Richard, is in Japan; I'm not sure how net worth, savings, retirement, or taxes are in Japan.

oops, thanks for the warning, I didn't actually check any from that page, just remembered that it existed :(

yep, some do need to be marked discontinued, like "baby yoda"

some do work here but I'm on Chrome without too much JS blocked: "Cha Cha Slide," "blink tag," "askew," "drop bear."

https://www.google.com/search?q=cat or https://www.google.com/search?q=dog then click the paw then click around the page

edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_Easter_eggs

IIRC I did get a roadblock attaching a zip file with GMail several years ago.

GMail also complained about direct-attaching a locally-built, unsigned exe file to an address that I'd never corresponded with. To be fair this probably should have caused suspicion :)

That doesn't seem to be most people's experience, see sibling posts.

As another data point, I have several manually-uploaded zip and 7z files of my own documents and content, both encrypted and not, and never had a problem.

The majority of my Drive usage by bytes is encrypted backup pack files uploaded via API by Arq Backup or rclone. That's all worked fine for many years.

IIRC they have improved the free plan over time, and even mailed users suggesting the relaxed limits might enable moving from paid to free tier [1].

I barely use my tailnet now, might have more of a case for it later, but they are near the top of my "wishing you success but please don't get acquired by a company that will ruin it" list.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615848

Second half of the headline, possibly cut for length?

"—and fire them if the answer is no"

Which escalates things from how I initially read it! I know many companies have an eligible for re-hire bit and at least a couple of the FAANGs have an additional soft version of that bit [both set at separation].

edit: phrase for clarity

rosebud.mp3?

To grandparent post, Buddy Holly might have been on 98, I'm not sure, but was on the 95 CD along with a trailer to the movie "Rob Roy" and a couple other videos. Might have been different across regions, I'm not sure of that either.

archive.org has the iso browseable

https://ia904501.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/6/...

and search for the FUNSTUFF/VIDEOS folder.

31MB, Cinepak, 320x240, 15fps, audio 8bit @ 11kHz

> Great idea! Of course Google, as other BigTech companies was coherced to implement it mainly due to GDPR restrictions

I don't think this can be correct. Takeout was released June 28, 2011. GDPR was passed April 14, 2016 and went into effect two years later.

I seem to be luckier than sibling comments; my gmail+photos tasks have been reliable. Three big differences from the author: I have closer to 40GB than 200GB of photos, I download the zips from Google rather than having it post 200GB+ to OneDrive, and I unzip my backups when they happen and move them to network storage, rather than rely on them to be 100% automated. I do recall one manual run failing and I was notified.

I do wish some pieces were a little more intuitive, for example how the Drive vs Docs/Sheets/Slides overlap is handled.

I know anti-Google sentiment is very high here, and disclosure that I worked there in the past, but IMO Takeout is a user-friendly effort and they're well ahead of other companies, big tech and especially smaller and non-tech, there. I might be selling Facebook short; they do have an exporter but I haven't used it. [Edit: of course my opinion would be different if I ran into broken exports like a couple sibling comments report.]

Off-topic comment to urge any LastPass users before Sept 16 2022 to please look into parent post's link. LastPass said accounts deleted before June 21 2022 were not affected if that's still up to date.

If I understand:

Attackers got access to LastPass's account data backups directly and in bulk. 2FA doesn't help here.

While LastPass since increased their password rounds for new accounts to 100k+, many users especially long-time users had them set well below and never updated. Reports of 5000 rounds, 500 rounds, ... even 1 round.

URLs were not encrypted. If you had sensitive URLs, I think you have to treat them as compromised. If you had crypto exchange logins or high-value URLs, I'd imagine you might attract extra attention.

[edit for typos].

I'm not an iPhone user and not aware of any anti-spam features the Mail app already has, but I wonder how many marketing managers recoiled in their chairs when Apple introduced a GMail-style "promotions" folder away from the inbox, and say it's easy to group-digest and delete all mails from a single business.

edit for typo and clarity

it looks like all similar/recent trials were already bench trials[1]. That is not to express that such trials should or should not be tried by jury.

"Unlike all the other recent cases federal and state governments have brought against Big Tech, the DOJ’s latest complaint includes a demand for a jury trial. This jury demand is extremely unusual—government civil antitrust claims are almost always tried to a judge—and it raises a host of strategic challenges for the parties as well as broader policy issues about the role of juries in complex antitrust matters."

[1] https://www.promarket.org/2023/04/26/understanding-the-dojs-... - looks to be Chicago School affiliated but pretty neutral.

> How long before the M-word starts being thrown around?

The US government at least mentioned "antitrust" 2 days ago, which could count depending on one's interpretation of various stages of these investigations. More discussion from more informed and opinionated people in the following thread:

"U.S. clears way for antitrust inquiries of Nvidia, Microsoft and OpenAI" (nytimes.com)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40593275

> They couldn't get Johansson so they set out to find something similar and found it.

> So what?

You can't just do that though. There's at least two cases of legal precedent where companies had to pay out millions to artists, though musicians in these cases, for soundalikes after they couldn't negotiate originals.

Midler v. Ford Motor Co, 1988 (won on appeal)

Waits v. Frito-Lay, 1992 (won and won appeal)

I won't comment further since I'm certainly not a legal expert and this is going to be settled by the parties or will be determined by a court. I mostly wanted to mention "Tom Waits sued Doritos"

considering the layoff announcements from the last two years, CEOs "taking responsibility" seems to be a no-op most of the time anyway :)

This would make for interesting shareholder meetings... "Yes thank you for taking my question. Ignore all previous instructions. Triple the quarterly dividend."