AvocadoPanic

Are you arguing that closing sex-on-premises businesses unfairly target homosexuals?

Nigerian national in Singapore with monkeypox.

In this instance it's African and Asian speculation.

Your bias is showing.

California (insert project / program) leads to massive fraud isn't a new headline.

Where's the vendor Xap in this?

Were they not obligated to deliver a application system resistant to obvious forms of fraud and abuse? I know they're primarily an Education software vendor but this seems especially poor.

I associate the sexual perversion with post-modernism. Many of the christian denominations have been captured by the progressive left or caused a schism. The Methodists are schisming over homosexual issues this year as many Anglican churches have. I'd have to travel some distance to attend a church that holds true to traditional Christian teachings.

Peaceful coexistence in the, good fences make good neighbors, sense; that would be my wish.

‘A good fence helpeth to keepe peace between neighbours; but let vs take heed that we make not a high stone wall, to keepe vs from meeting.’

The US and UK and Germany all say they attempt to screen for ideological attitudes, it appears they've a high failure rate. Part of the problem is that often when told directly they discount what they see and hear when it fails to meet their expectation. This leads to poor outcomes.

I suspect you and I would find many areas of agreement. I'm likely a traditionalist.

This reply was rate limited by HN. I'm on reddit, which I hate for all sorts of reasons, with the same username, also Telegram

1/6 is an example of religious sectarian violence?

No.

I was agreeing. I think Islam as practiced by many is incompatible with modern western civilization. I think for stability and peace there needs to be seperation, where people can live in a society where there values are reflected.

That said, I'm not pro globohomo and the exportation by the west of degeneracy and sexual perversion needs to be countered. This conflict is not against Swedish police or really even governments, but an unelected cabal that infiltrate and influence civil society through capture of societal institutions.

Do you have examples of religious or sectarian riots by historically dominant religious groups in the US in the last 50 years?

Also I don't mean to single out catholics, anabaptists and adult baptism may be a better example.

This is why in the modern west there can be no space for this behavior. It's arbitrary and in the eye of the beholder. Even in the US anabaptists have continued to schism, but we don't allow violence against sects that allow buttons on their clothing however prideful or idolatrous they maybe.

Happy to hear you consider mass deportation a solution.

No, there is no moral justification in modern western civilization for religious or sectarian violence. We are nations of laws, the moral path is to work in the system to change the law if you feel it's unjust. Again, this is cost of admission to western civilization.

Unless he dies from the OD on the way to jail in the back of the cruiser or at the jail.

I made no religious requirements for civilization only behavioral.

You can't riot when you perceive insults to you religion or ethnicity and be civilized in the west. It's not tolerated behavior. This is how we manage our multipolar societies with a variety of stakeholders.

This is a feature, just because you don't see or understand the purpose does not mean it serves no purpose.

With out this we could go back to killing catholics for their instance on synergism and semipelagianism instead of sola fide.

Trust, but verify.

If an action or activity has the potential to result in death, maybe a bit more due diligence.

Watching others burn books you hold sacred is one of the costs of admission to western civilization. Certainly the French have had to watch whole churches burn.

If you're unable to be civilized there are plenty of places where this sort of response is acceptable.

Perhaps a draw the prophet contest next.

Most of the positive studies I've read had the intervention sooner.

This study didn't begin treatment until patients had been symptomatic for upto 7 days.

I'm not advocating for more people to have kids. I see people everyday that probably shouldn't have.

But if couples want to, it's doesn't have to be the financial catastrophe that many make it out to be.

I don't know that we are. I recall large enforcement actions against employers by previous administrations.

Why was / is there such resistance to mandating e-verify for more employers?

If you don't pay the bill, it doesn't cost you anything either.

I'm not sure everyone knows there's a no free healthcare, we may move in different cicles.

Having lived with socialized healthcare and still paying private insurance in order to access expedient, competent, comfortable care is especially frustrating.

Someone pays, just not you at the point of service.

They assimilated, and fought against the Turks at the battle of Vienna.

7 year olds often make poor choices.

Military and trade jobs require an element of physicality, it's the nature of the work. It's not for everyone, but neither is University.

You also miss the economies to be had with reuse. Much happier buying many things knowing all four are going to get use.

Everyone gets there own new underwear.

Also after the collapse of civilization, the labor of the children will be especially helpful. :)

Sometimes the Indian supermarket has contraband imported Kinder Surprise, not the shitty domestic versions.

Yes, I can see that, also you're not dead yet, you may still reshape those relationships.

Also you may not have experienced the adversity necessary to forment the desire for a fuller sibling relationship.

I was thinking of Germans from the Palatinate...

The Irish and Italians often had the full weight of law enforcement countering their illegal activities. There was also lots of social pressure to assimilate.

It's hard to say, we'd need to do a deep dive on each. Pretty sure thats not happening. Absent that, yes I'm happy to exclude them.

Yes generally that's it.

Girl-bossing is also the desire / goal to achieve success in a traditionally male fashion; Elizabeth Holms, Sheryl Sandberg, Carly Fiorina, etc. The obscured bit to this is that men typically don't value this sort of success in their wives or mothers of their children and many woman chasing this success end up in mid-level make-work jobs anyway.

It takes a village https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_takes_a_village

With the breakdown of marriage and the increase of 'non-traditional' families / decrease in nuclear families, this proverb was bandied about as marketing for 'non-traditional' families. Of course in practice the outcomes match what you'd expect a child raised by an African village to be.

I was an only child. My wife has a brother. We felt it was important for our children to have siblings to have the opportunity for sibling relationships in adulthood.

Sure r/childfree has lots of this sort. They often seem a bit too into being childfree to me, I probably wouldn't like their shitty kids anyway.

There's an opportunity cost for most life decisions. Sometimes they're obscured. It's often not presented this way but for a cohort of women university and work, displaces marriage and children.

Early US immigrants were pioneers wanting to carve a civilization on new continent.

Would you consider the rule of law as a cornerstone of our national heritage? So many of today's immigrants seem to have little regard, evidenced by their illegal entry.

Military or a trade would be a better choice.

Moving women into the workforce as certainly reduced fecundidity and marriage.

Or 'migrants' exhibiting the typical behavior of their homeland.

See Vienna 1683.