Alphasite_

Feel free to disable sip, or just unprotect the folders you don't want protected (although the latter would get wiped out after updates).

I wouldn't say Swift's type system is particularly simple, I rather like it, but it does have a lot of complexities.

ITs open source in the same way OSX and iOS are open source (although more open, i will admit) the core is open, but a very large proportion of the key services are closed and difficult to replace.

Wouldn't this be an argument of rising auto type conversions?

Yes, but at that point, aren't they just text based IDEs?

Relying on the accuracy of a VIM mode implies that the best way to do with VIM does is to do exactly what VIM does, when there may be better, but less familiar ones.

Its only the IPC layer...

Honestly, that at least has improved significantly.

Neither C nor C++ is often thrown up as the gold standard for type systems nor expressiveness.

Yes. If you have the app installed infuriatingly persistent, less so if you dont. Not having the app installed means you have to deal with the terrible youtube web player (which doesn't even use native fullscreen!).

I found home-brew much more problematic and more significantly much slower when i last used it (a few years back now).

Swift is another new language with it. Its getting to be the norm now.

14 million I believe.

That seems the opposite, very few things need those dynamic features and those that do can be special cased, which makes Objc the more pure but equally more academic language to me.

Either way someone looses out, bookmarks were so handy.

It's also been less of a memory hog than the equivilent chrome set up for me.

I never said it was.

Falling behind was never IEs worst 'feature'. Standards compliance, security and speed were much bigger issues.

It's not that simple, as far as I know Hindi and Urdu are effectively the same language when spoken, with some small divergences but use a different character set. How would regard that?

Because you're sacrificing consistancy and type safety for object to avoid increasing the syntax which feels like optimising for the wrong metric.

Well no, it could be argued that it is a free market of sorts.

No, bit odd is too low level for this and I believe it's only used for iOS apps ATM.

That's a london thing, it's (approximately) only a pound or two in a lot of other places.

I don't know about code contracts, but IntelliJ does have an equivilent, if less advanced version of these as well, using Java annotations. Although it's mostly used for nullability/taint detection ATM.

There is a counterpoint to this whole thing, apple doesn't have a free tier, which is to the artists benefit.

VAT pretty much covers it completely, sans vat its £66.

Lawsuits tend to put a dampener on things, so there is that.

That was on hold for legal reasons.

Last I checked they had 50k total staff and a big chunk of that would be in sales.

Yeah. But you don't have to, you're literally complaint that the user has options. It's not like Go doesn't have a GC either.