87 karma · joined July 18, 2008
I am sure CircleCI takes security very seriously but it also nice (and a requirement for certain companies) that with a self hosted CI server, that your source code does not leave the company.
A business that processes 60K a year is below the size that is targeted by this pricing structure. They are better off continuing to pay 2.75% per transaction.
From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_card_fraud#Merchants): "The liability for the fraud is determined by the details of the transaction. If the merchant retrieved all the necessary pieces of information and followed all of the rules and regulations the financial institution would bear the liability for the fraud. If the merchant did not get all of the necessary information they would be required to return the funds to the financial institution. This is all determined through the credit card processory."
From what I have seen, it is very common for the merchant to be liable for losses on a card not present transaction (e.g. online retail) but the credit card company stomaches the losses for a card present transaction.
I suspect that online merchants could reduce their liability by implementing things like Verified by Visa but choose not to because it causes them to lose too many legitimate sales.
Damnit, LinkedIn.
Even if someone were to keep the device in their phone all the time I do not think it would wear out their headphone jack. It is no different than keeping headphones plugged in all the time.
So in January and February they were doing less than 1M per day.
How many stories like this are out there now? Hundreds?
Brilliant. I've forwarded this to my team.
We make a tax solution and I've been dealing with vague "we should use NoSQL" comments from a few of the less capable members of the team.
If his team members read all the way to the comments it's going to be very awkward tomorrow at work.
When this happens should the maintainer write back to the contributor and explain to them how they would like to code to be written instead (can be very difficult to explain). Or if the maintainer has time should they fix the code up themselves and merge it in?
One is an AI genius and the other is a XP coach. They are on very different levels intellectually.
AAAAAaaah... What?
I now wonder if Google will be closing that office...
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/interview-with-barney-p...
Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about but having half of Live search running off Windows search and the remaining part being handled by Powerset's unix boxes sounds silly. Or at least I will think I am seeing pigs fly if it every happens.