1,347 karma · joined July 22, 2014
I also knew long beforehand that subjective experience is filtered by the brain, but having that fact forcibly shown to me was a whole other ballgame. I was also much calmer and more giving afterwards. I'm not sure why - maybe spending eight hours while super high and with a diminished ego makes you want to revisit that mindset.
Long after the trip and even occasionally today, I still see patterns in trees that are very reminiscent of how they looked while tripping. This may be a bit silly, but it's a nice cautionary reminder that my brain is capable of imposing order where there is none.
Superficially, I went from hating to loving electronic music, and felt euphoria for the first time.
> “People will take psilocybin at a rave or at Burning Man” — the art and performance desert festival — “but the effect,” he said, “evaporates like water running through their hands.”
It certainly doesn't hurt to have a trip sitter or to discuss the experience with someone understanding, but this is a completely unwarranted conclusion. It seems like Dr. Griffiths needs it to not have an effect outside of a clinical setting, which is just so unfortunate. I would rate doing mushrooms as one of the single most important decisions of my life.
> “Moreover, to ensure full integrity of the data, we’ve made an additional copy of our database before restoring the system,” ING’s press release reads.
What? Am I to interpret this to mean that ING has a single backup of its data under normal conditions?
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1573454 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manage...
If I'm working on so many projects that I need a special script just to navigate between them, there's no way I'll be able to really contribute to any one of them. Am I not seeing the obvious use case for gh?
While I could see where it was coming from, this would be incredibly confusing for a beginner, who wouldn't even know to report this as a problem - they might conclude that "piece of bread" was just incorrect.
I'm surprised by this. I've never had a good experience with outsourced programmers. Am I just in some unfortunate bubble of failure?
[1] http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49366487/ns/technology_and_science...
I am glossing over the concept of gene drives, which is potentially worrisome, but as far as accidents go the risk is literally zero.
In fact, the downside of crispr is that making changes in mammals is still difficult. Progress is being made on delivery mechanisms, but it fundamentally can't go into a runaway process. You'll always need an injection of some sort, or some deliberate action the part of a doctor.