8,274 karma · joined August 27, 2020
>>> This is a fuzzy recollection of something I believe I read, which might well be inaccurate, and for which I can find no corroboration. I mention it solely because it might spark memories from someone who actually knows:
>>> A company used 192.168.x.x example addresses in some early documentation. A number of people followed the manual literally when setting up their internal networks. As a result, it was already being used on a rather large number of private networks anyway, so it was selected when the RFC 1597 was adopted.
>> sun
> Wasn't 192.9.200.x Sun's example network?
of course you are correct. sorry. jet lag and not enough coffee.
---
So no answers.
It can be helpful to remember that while less efficient, for scenarios where ssh as root is a no-go you can ship snapshot syncs (including incremental ones) as files:
zfs send [...] tank > tank.zfssnap
cat tank.zfssnap | zfs recv [...] bank- First-class experience only via walled and gated Google Play and Apple Appstore. They brand as "human first" but it's unclear if it will even be available/supported outside of human-hostile platforms. Looks pretty "corporate first".
- No public API
- No source
- External presence exclusively on: Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Tiktok
- https://docs.digg.com/privacy
Hard pass. The only possibly attractive thing would be the name.
I did mention it in this Discussions thread a while back (which the support agent at one point in July hilariously linked me to asking if I had read, making it clear they hadn't done so themselves).
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/147437#discuss...
Initial support response mentioned here:
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/147437#discuss...
Humans gonna human.
They keep closing the ticket and saying it's "with the engineering team". I keep reopening and asking for resolution, escalation, or progress.
GitHub did have working and professional support in the past but in 2025 they are just malicious.
It's surreal.
Guessing unrelated to the comment itself, prolly got a minor downvote army on my back after a different recent comment on Gaza matters.
Downvotes are just a noisy signal in general and I wouldn't read that much into a few here and there, it comes with the territory.
Oh and yeah, this meta makes for tedious threads so site guidelines and all that.
Switching your existing build-infra to sync sources from a new remote should be a snap.
Also no major need to hound maintainers to ship a release or merge that neglected bugfix or feature you desperately need - just cherry-pick it.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-strike-gaz...
https://www.thejournal.ie/israel-strikes-gaza-hospital-killi...
Part of a pattern.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/12/pattern-isra...
In very specific and rare circumstances (like your PG example) it can make sense for post-grad adults.
Anything beyond that is probably related to your IP address being tracked (so change internet provider to get a fresh start there and if you currently use a VPN: switch or stop).
So assuming they're looking at a decompiled ROM, the actual sources probably look completely different so it's pretty inane to complain about ugly loops and lookups and hardcoded numbers.
The weird looping in the beginning might as well be an attempt at obfuscation meant precisely to annoy and distract readers like OP. Or if it's an artefact of some dev/debug feature left in the build: Big deal, really got them there.
"qwertyuiopasdfghjkl" or "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabc" are not stronger than "kmY7$®f0V".
For tomorrow we should keep exploring and adopting improvements. Pick your poison.
[0]: Discovery left as excercise for reader