28 karma · joined October 30, 2014
Obviously someone at Apple decided this makes business sense. What's the thinking?
I now realize that in retrospect it was a huge mistake as I missed out on a lot. I think on a certain level, if you don't have a FB, people won't make the extra effort to try and contact you. Its most important social function is turning acquaintances into friends
So just as a PSA, please please use Facebook. Even if you don't like it and you think they're a horrible company, you won't appreciate how much you're hurting yourself till it's too late
The core language is still a confusing mess (I'm still never sure when to use a matrix, a dataframe, a list..), but if you use their tools you can ignore it for the most part.
In under 10 lines you can massage data and generate fantastic graphics.
A little off topic: but does anyone know what their business model is? Are they going to run out of money and burnout in a year or two?
the 3 giants are working together...
If you read "Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community?" (which he wrote towards the end of his life), he basically says that the Civil Rights movement needs to shift from racial agenda to an agenda of helping the poor. However he never presents an actual plan other than some vague idea of a massive transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People%27s_Campaign
I'd go farther to argue that he's not a communist b/c he wasn't really thinking in those terms and he actively tried to avoid the label (that's why he took for ever to stand up against the war in Vietnam)
Until we're able to analytically evaluate perception (which we are no where close to understanding), what you're describing isn't possible
If there is some method to turn $1 into $2 then there is a whole sea of people who are better and smarter than me who will keep doing it till that method no longer works.
I'm definitely not an R guru or "in" on the latest news, but it seems that Hadley Wickham (who probably single handedly is the reason R is still relevant) now works for the RStudio guys and he's reworking his tools. plyr is now dplyr and gpplot2 is now ggvis. And there also another tool called tinyr. My understanding is that they're still in development, but they'll ultimately provide an "integrated" ecosystem for processing data.frames (with hooks into the RStudio IDE)
He talks about it at the beginning of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wki0BqlztCo
- They tried too hard to do a Tuft* - but it's actually way too flashy.
- Basically the issue is that it's not generic enough. Whenever you see a ggplot2 plot it's always screaming at you "I WAS MADE IN ggplot2!!" Just KISS...
- The grey background is completely unusable if you want to print out your charts!
- The default pastel colors (ie. PowerPoint 2012) are always a disaster for readability. In meetings people constantly can't tell them apart and they are definitely not colorblind friendly.
It' a shame b/c each script I write ends up having to have an obnoxiously long theme declaration to make it look "normal"
* I think most people miss the Tuft's point. He presents a way about thinking about data presentation. Instead people just look at it and think "oooo! That looks pretty. Let me copy what he did". The guy has his own personal style - it's definitely nice, but the point isn't to copy it.
EDIT: For those thinking about learning ggplot2.. maybe wait off for a bit. It seems like it'll be deprecated soon and replaces with ggvis.