World of Tanks has repeatedly had military personnel updating the technical specifications with details they have found in the secret manuals.
9,102 karma · joined October 12, 2022
World of Tanks has repeatedly had military personnel updating the technical specifications with details they have found in the secret manuals.
So, the company kinda honored the contract.
The world has not literally ended yet, so all concerns are overblown.
I can surely squirrel away a couple of GPUs into any random closet and rent out the capacity.
Even with that, global strategic petroleum reserves are quickly draining. Last I looked, the US was down to ~290M. There is a legal limit of 250M (though laws don’t matter anymore). The structural floor is also estimated to be somewhere north of 200M.
The world is about to not be able to meet all oil demand for any price.
I have no problem if the US navy wants to tool around shipping lanes for the good of global trade. I take issue with everything else.
In the past couple of years, the US has implicitly used the strength of its military to threaten the sovereignty of Greenland, Panama, Canada, Mexico, and Cuba. Abducted a foreign head of state. Started a war. Bombed drug runners and fishermen.
The death toll for the Iraq war is heavily contested, but the numbers are somewhere in the region of 200k to one million dead. All under the guise of WMDs.
Like any large organization, there is a mixture of good and bad outcomes.
Regardless, there are a bunch of new visual glitches in the release, with regressed performance all over the place.
If you have never seen this summary of the Metal Gear series, buckle up: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aaLiLRVeaZA
If you are in the market for a multi hundred dollar watch, you must have considered the Garmin and Apple offering for non-time features. Surely some of those people are happy to share their decision.
I am surprised opposition is not even stronger.
Still leaves me questioning how anyone could wage war. If the Harkonens could barely afford it, nobody can.
Also wondering if the Guild charges different rates for goods vs military. What is worth the brutal intergalactic shipping prices that you would not develop local industry to create it? Surely nobody is moving grain or ore, yet the Guild ships are portrayed as comically massive.
How could anyone wage war like this? The defenders will always outnumber the attackers.
Neither R nor Pandas will shuffle results by default.
Tried to use modern technology for the health of his son and was digitally executed for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...
There was that infamous picture of the Steam Group, something like, “Never Buy CoD XYZ”. Half of the group members were playing it.
Pandas is more ergonomic in that some ideas can be more tersely represented. The downside is that this results in more dynamism which can change if the underlying data gets updated. Polars is more strict in that it will not silently flip a data type on you. However this strictness does come at the cost of being a bit slower to type and some data idioms not having a good Polars equivalent.
People like to note the speed improvements, but that is the least interesting thing about the library. Rarely have I ever had a problem where I was bottlenecked by Pandas throughout.
Polars is very much a Pandas 2.0 with a bunch of lessons learned. I do not think it is earth shattering changes, but it is worth migrating when you can.
I do not think of a dataframe as a set, but an ordered collection of rows. My source csv had the rows in this order and I want that maintained unless I choose maximum performance.