Hold up one second, if you click on the pdf in the article http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/06/17/rel7a.pdf and turn to page 5, you see "Government surveillance of U.S. citizens" - 61% Disapprove, 35% Approve, and 4% no opinion.
"And for the past few years the Obama administration has reportedly been gathering and analyzing information from major internet companies about audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails and documents involving people in other countries in an attempt to locate suspected terrorists. The government reportedly does not target internet usage by U.S. citizens and if such data is collected, it is kept under strict controls. Do you think the Obama administration was right or wrong in gathering and analyzing that internet data?"
vs
"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling: Government surveillance of U.S. citizens:"
The question for government surveillance is a lot more strait forward. The other has a paragraph and has buzz words .
If you're honest with yourself and ask the right questions, people will tell you what they think. It might not be as logical as you want, but we live in a fuzzy world.
In other words, click bait or agenda.