66% Believe Obama Administration 'Right' to Analyze and Collect Internet Data
weeklystandard.com
weeklystandard.com
If you're honest with yourself and ask the right questions, people will tell you what they think. It might not be as logical as you want, but we live in a fuzzy world.
In other words, click bait or agenda.
"And for the past few years the Obama administration has reportedly been gathering and analyzing information from major internet companies about audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails and documents involving people in other countries in an attempt to locate suspected terrorists. The government reportedly does not target internet usage by U.S. citizens and if such data is collected, it is kept under strict controls. Do you think the Obama administration was right or wrong in gathering and analyzing that internet data?"
vs
"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling: Government surveillance of U.S. citizens:"
The question for government surveillance is a lot more strait forward. The other has a paragraph and has buzz words .
Also the discrepancy in this survey (already pointed out in another post) makes this survey pretty questionable.
Case in point, Question 17:
"Do you think the Obama administration has gone too far, has been about right, or has not gone far enough in restricting people's civil liberties in order to fight terrorism?"
Too far 43% | About right 38% | Not far enough 17% | No opinion 1%
55% say it's either "not far enough" or "about right" - while the same report shows that 61% disapprove of "Government surveillance of American citizens". The same question asked two different ways yielded vastly different responses. The media (the majority of whom are Obama supporters) have managed to confuse the public and make this less about the fact that a modern KGB has been built, and more about whether or not people believe that Obama has good intentions with these programs.