I've heard of it happening at smaller organizations or sole proprietorships (small business), but it is strange to see from a company as large as Samsung.
What's important is how high up the chain this was sanctioned by. If it's a lowly manager somewhere, he/she will just get fired and this will all blow over. If it's right at the top, it's much more embarrassing.
You mean the time when Apple tried to patent "0-length-swipe" and a shape of a box?
While this is definitely super-scummy and nasty behaviour from Samsung, it's hard to take any comment seriously when it uses such a flawed new-speak phrase like "IP theft".
Even more so when it tries to gain substance by referring to Samsung as the bad guy when "violating" (or "stealing" lol) Apple's rounded rectangle patents.
Apple has their bullshit software patents constantly invalidated everywhere in the world except the US. Good thing Samsung footed the legal bill to make that happen.
Samsung Inflates Galaxy Tab Sales, Gets Busted
http://modmyi.com/content/360-samsung-inflates-galaxy-tab-sa...
Quite smooth: Samsung actually sold 1/10 of the 2 million Galaxy Tabs it claimed in 2010
http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/151854/quite-smooth-samsung...
Looks Like Samsung Pretty Much Lied About US Sales To The Public
http://www.macgasm.net/2012/08/10/looks-like-samsung-pretty-...
Samsung Hires 'Actors' To Pretend To Be Happy Galaxy Tab Testers?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110325/12360313633/samsun...
Samsung caught presenting actors as Galaxy Tab "consumers," fudging thinnest tablet claims
http://appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/samsung_caught_pre...
Here’s how Samsung flew bloggers halfway around the world, then threatened to leave them there.
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/09/02/heres-samsung-flew-...
Samsung Caught Fudging Testimonials, and Lying about Galaxy Tab’s Thickness
http://techie-buzz.com/gadgets-news/samsung-galaxy-tab-fake-...
I wouldn't be surprised if the execs who sanctioned this behavior on Samsung's part don't even understand that it was wrong.
It's probably worth noting that Korea "chaebol" (conglomerates) can be a little odd. They have a lot of power over the local government and media, so they end up thinking they are invincible. They are sometimes said to be very shady, at times.
That's where it's different in Asia, where such behavior is business as usual.
(with their oncoming push into notebook computers, I expect similar fraudulent reviews in that area as well)
"Tax evasion, bribery and price-fixing: How Samsung became the giant that ate Korea"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/tax-evasion-bri...
"Samsung's rocky legal past paints a picture of scandal and corruption"
http://www.theverge.com/policy/2012/8/7/3226651/samsung-lega...
"Samsung Bribery Probe Points to Pattern of Graft in South Korea"
(I'm not saying it isn't true, just they aren't necessarily reporting everything.)
As an example, during the Apple vs Samsung patent wars (after Samsung lost), a handful of publications were writing in support of Apple even when most of them knew that Apple was abusing the patent system to its core. Most of them looked very much like they were paid by Apple to write it. Some even went as far as saying the win for Apple is good for innovation (which obviously it is not)[1]. Another example is once an author from Techcrunch even admitted to getting compensated monetarily by Apple to write a post bashing a competitor.
Apple, Samsung, LG, Sony, Panasonic, etc. are no different from each other. So let's not get religious, shall we?
[1] http://gizmodo.com/5938193/apple-winning-the-patent-wars-is-...
Given the history, it's silly to suggest Gizmodo is being paid by Apple to write positive stories about them. I doubt Apple would even pick up the phone if Gizmodo called them.
One guy was caught but let's not criticize him because everyone not caught could have done the same thing!