> Unfortunately, Nadella also refers to AI as “super intelligence” throughout the post.
What's the deal with these clowns? Nadella's estimated net worth is like $600M. Is that still not enough for him to buy himself a spine?
What's the deal with these clowns? Nadella's estimated net worth is like $600M. Is that still not enough for him to buy himself a spine?
No rich man or woman is a friend of society.
That is why governments fear revolt from the poor. They have nothing more to lose.
People think that money makes you strong, maybe it does but only upto like a couple million dollars if at all, well whatever amount will give you a lifetime of comfortable life, after that it's all about how to preserve or make more money.
The more you have the more reason you have to do the wrong thing.
See also: Peoples’ Front of Judea vs Judean Peoples Front.
1337 bro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence
Or any of the literature on the subject from the past 30 years: From here
[1] https://nickbostrom.com/papers/how-long-before-superintellig...
to more recently:
[2] https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence/
For context, Nick Bostrom, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever are big names in AI. There is a reason they were using this term back in 2023.
Bend the knee or Trump will destroy your company. And every Republican in Congress is cool with that.
Anyone who doesnt see the calculus is a mental gymnast.
My AI is regularly solving master's thesis level, and sometimes Ph.D thesis level problems for the purpose of, e.g. routine tasks like filling out random paperwork.
It's been very odd.
I'd only assume Nadella has access to more advanced models than I do, just as much as I have more advanced models than my relatives.
Using it is embarrassing.
Whose loyalty test? How?
I mostly heard "super intelligence" a long, long time ago in the context of work on AI / philosophy / futurism which, honestly, sounded pretty detached until the current deep learning sprint, and now sounds pretty prophetic.
Wait, the renaming was from a speech on 11 September in fact, I lost track.
Thank you.
That sucks. It's a helpful term. Now, it's politicized.
He knows humiliation (from his father and from Putin) and he loves to dish it out to others.
This is Reek, basically.
People who comply scar their reputation and trustworthiness, so that it's harder for them to build any alliance against the authoritarian in the future, ex: "We all know Bob lied to keep his job... But if they threaten his job again, doesn't that mean he might lie to us too?"
He has a litany of weaknesses, failings and shortcomings, but he is an international expert at humiliating, suborning and breaking people. His mendacity is very nearly unparalleled.