Those some people can't recite a book to any given person in the world at any given time. There's a difference.
You're not making sense.
The problem is the reciting. Not the reading. And hence, not the training.
Whether this is right or not is a seperate question.
That is not the situation we are discussing. No one is arguing that what you describe is infringement.
What we are discussing is the training - which happens BEFORE the broadcast. It is analogous to reading. Is simply READING the material an infringement.
Current copyright laws are simply not prepared for this unprecedented use.
Reading a book embeds its contents into your brain. And yet, that is considered fair use.
I agree, the analogies are meaningless in a legal context. In the legal context, the courts disagree with you.