> Most people can't recite a book
Yes - but some people can.
Are they criminals for reading books?
Yes - but some people can.
Are they criminals for reading books?
You're not making sense.
The problem is the reciting. Not the reading. And hence, not the training.
Whether this is right or not is a seperate question.
That is not the situation we are discussing. No one is arguing that what you describe is infringement.
What we are discussing is the training - which happens BEFORE the broadcast. It is analogous to reading. Is simply READING the material an infringement.
Current copyright laws are simply not prepared for this unprecedented use.
Reading a book embeds its contents into your brain. And yet, that is considered fair use.
I agree, the analogies are meaningless in a legal context. In the legal context, the courts disagree with you.