There is no logic in Nathan’s argument - only a facade of logic designed to justify his misogyny. He constructs a false trichotomy where every “choice” serves only to strip women of their rights or autonomy. That’s not reason - that’s prejudice dressed up in pseudo-rational language.

You cannot reason someone out of a position they didn’t arrive at through reason. Nathan’s view is not a logical conclusion - it’s a pre-existing bias looking for any excuse to present itself as inevitable.

And if you genuinely don’t see the problem with that - if you believe that calling out misogyny is somehow “emotional manipulation” - then you need to take a long, hard look at yourself. Because whether you realise it or not, you are aligning yourself with a worldview that is profoundly dangerous to women.