>Of course, there are lots of companies trying to eliminate job positions because they think AI can do it. That won't work at all (and if it does, the result will no longer be competitive than companies that use AI to help their workers do better), so those companies will be ripe for disruption next year.

Could you please expand upon this? One of the visions I have of the mid-term future is that a company could be run entirely by a solo entrepreneur or a small executive team, with all the rest done by various AI agents. I would appreciate a good argument for why a company like that would necessarily be ripe for disruption.