In my book, anything that improves the quality of the output that a person can produce, or decreases the time they spend doing falls into the bucket of adding middle-class jobs. (When things get cheaper, we end up using more of them -- See Jevon's Paradox.)

Of course, there are lots of companies trying to eliminate job positions because they think AI can do it. That won't work at all (and if it does, the result will no longer be competitive than companies that use AI to help their workers do better), so those companies will be ripe for disruption next year.

You're reading this comment on HN, so you can probably figure out the next chapter of this story on your own.