Hacker News Reader

So long as both manufacturers and executives are willing to assume unlimited liability for all direct, incidental, and consequential losses caused by both updates themselves and any security vulnerabilities in the update mechanism, and are held criminally liable in cases where negligence leads to injury or death, I have no problem with this.

View on HN

Why would they be, anymore than for the original product?

Also, do you have a single example where there was a security vulnerability in the update mechanism of a car that resulted in an attack? Do you have a single example of a loss caused by an update (that would not also occur during offline servicing)?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com