When the first amendment was drafted 233 years ago do you think they anticipated that one day anyone would be able to speak in anyone else's voice, indistinguishably from if they had actually said it? The constitution does occasionally need re-evaluating in light of new technology, like when the right to bear arms was effectively narrowed to the right to bear some arms when the most powerful weapons vastly outstripped what the general public could reasonably be expected to handle. Few people will unironically argue that 2A means that everyone should be allowed to have a nuke.