I thought the weird thing about mortgages is it is new money that expands the money supply.
(it's money if its extremely liquid - the bank account holders can still do things with their invested money)
Is it? Since the house seller wants to have cold, hard cash (or, these days, an incoming wire transfer, which still counts as M1), the large investors need to cough up that much money to make the transaction happen.
Second, 5-6% of the typical sale go toward the agents and closing costs. Again, this is money that leave the system.
Third, if some of the sale proceeds are applied to repaying an existing mortgage or to finance a home purchase, this is neutral as far as the "investor-backed mortgages create money" argument goes.