That includes Twitter/X, so not sure what your YouTube video has to do with anything.
That includes Twitter/X, so not sure what your YouTube video has to do with anything.
Are you implying that US companies should be above foreign local laws?
If you agree that companies should not be above the laws of the country they operate in, doesn't the same apply to ByteDance?
"TikTok comply with the US law, otherwise it would have already been banned"
This is the final result of their noncompliance with local laws. Just as Twitter/X's noncompliance with censorship laws has resulted in their ban in China.
What's funny is the Oracle partnership demonstrated to the world that CIA/NSA had access to these servers for years, "Operation Decoy Tables", so i would say, the current events are quite beneficial for both parties, China and Rest of the World, as for the US, it's sad that all eyes are on TikTok, but that's what you get for only having 2 choice of the same cake for November (hey, that's the month of my birthday, the 5th too!)
Since we passed a law about murder and injury once we never need worry about safety again! Silly lawmakers worrying about lead paint and checks notes creating the FDA.
Similarly here to ByteDance, which has violated American laws for years and is now experiencing the consequences of its non-compliance.
So actually, my claim is true; your understanding of US law is what is lacking here.
I encourage you to understand this issue more deeply. But if it is evidence you lack, here it is:
A timeline of TikTok's history of reported security flaws, continual failures to fix them, and why it is currently in this situation: https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-timeline-ban-biden-india-d...
A list of countries that have already banned TikTok and their reasons for doing so: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/these-countries-have-alre...
Of course, that list does not include China itself, which also has TikTok banned locally.