But the conclusion sums it up well:
> Meteor Lake abandons the familiar Sandy Bridge client design that characterized Intel’s consumer CPU offerings for more than a decade. In its place, we get a flexible chiplet strategy that lets Intel pile on accelerators in response to market demands.
All interesting things Intel are doing are chiplet based. I think it's partly about showcasing their packaging tech in an attempt to differentiate their fab offering. You could argue there's nothing very special in that respect here, they've done this process and vendor mixing before elsewhere. Except this will be a high volume product line so they need good yield and capacity. But that's just my read on it, maybe it's just the cheapest way to stay relevent.
The chiplet strategy is kind of ambitious too because there's power overhead and they're targeting battery powered devices with Meteor Lake.
Eh, writing is hard. I never liked English class anyway
Honestly though I don't like writing. Finding stuff out about hardware is fun. Weaving it into a coherent article is a chore.
I love researching things too but I can't write coherently. I really enjoyed your article, thank you.